Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

PUCO Approves One Nonbypassable Generation Rider at DP&L, Denies Another

May 29, 2014

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-14 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Karen Abbott • kabbott@energychoicematters.com

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has approved implementation of a nonbypassable rider for certain deferred generation costs at Dayton Power & Light, but denied making additional deferred transmission costs nonbypassable.

Specifically, PUCO approved DP&L's application to implement a nonbypassable reconciliation rider (RR-N), whose existence was previously approved under DP&L's electric security plan to recover any deferred balance that exceeds 10 percent of the base amount of bypassable riders FUEL, RPM, AER, and CBT.

PUCO agreed that a deferral balance has exceeded 10%, allowing DP&L to implement the rider. PUCO's approval was conditioned on adjustment for the annual audit of the FUEL and CBT riders, as PUCO, "share[s] Staff's concern regarding the reliability of DP&L's forecasts to determine the threshold of the base amounts of the riders."

"For this reason, we adopt Staff's recommendation for DP&L to work with Staff regarding the forecasting methodology and provide to Staff the variance analyses upon request. If the FUEL or CBT riders' actual expenses significantly vary from the forecast used to calculate the RR-N, then DP&L or Staff should file an issues list in this case," PUCO said.

The approved nonbypassable RR-N rate for all kilowatt-hours for the period June 1, 2014 through August 31, 2014, is $0.0014240 per kWh (Case 14-0629-EL-RDR).

Separately, in Case 14-0358-EL-RDR, PUCO denied DP&L's petition to transfer certain deferred costs from its bypassable transmission cost recovery rider (TCRR-B) to its nonbypassable transmission cost recovery rider (TCRR-N)

DP&L was seeking to include any deferral amount that exceeds 10 percent of the base costs of the TCRR-B in the TCRR-N.

"We find that DP&L's proposal to include any deferral amount that exceeds 10 percent of the base costs of the TCRR-B in the TCRR-N should be denied. Therefore, we find that DP&L's amended application to update its TCRR-N should be denied, and that DP&L should file revised tariffs," PUCO said

"TCRR-B deferral amounts should remain in the TCRR-B and should be recovered by DP&L over three months," PUCO said.

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- B2B Regional Sales Rep -- Retail Supplier -- NY/NJ/PA
NEW! -- Account Representative / Account Executive -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Business Development/Sales -- Retail Supplier -- New York
NEW! -- Senior Pricing & Structure Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Texas -- DFW
NEW! -- Account Manager
NEW! -- Billing Supervisor -- Retail Supplier -- Texas -- Houston
NEW! -- Energy Consultant / Analyst
NEW! -- Vice President of Supply -- Retail Provider -- Houston
NEW! -- VP/Director of Operations -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Power & Natural Gas Portfolio & Pricing Analyst -- Retail Provider -- Houston
NEW! -- Business Development Manager

Search for more retail energy careers:
RetailEnergyJobs.com


Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-13 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search