|
|
|
|
|
State Files Suits Against Three Retail Suppliers
The New Jersey Attorney General, the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs, and the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), have filed complaints in state court against three third-party energy suppliers – Palmco Power NJ, LLC & Palmco Energy NJ, LLC; HIKO Energy LLC; and Keil & Sons, Inc., d/b/a Systrum Energy.
"These three companies allegedly lured consumers with promised monthly savings that turned out to be fictional. Even worse, consumers who hoped to save money instead saw their bills increase to unconscionable levels," Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman alleged.
According to the State, Systrum Energy has ceased serving customers.
"To be clear, our action relates to the specific practices of these three companies and is not an indication of wrong-doing by other third-party energy suppliers. Deception and misrepresentation of consumers has no place in any aspect of New Jersey's marketplace," Hoffman said.
The State alleged that the three companies, among other things, deceived consumers through misrepresentations about "competitive" monthly pricing and/or guarantees that consumers would see reductions in their monthly electric and/or natural gas bills if they switched from their utility providers.
"Rather than realize these savings, the consumers saw their energy bills skyrocket during this past winter when Palmco, HIKO, and Systrum charged far more per kilowatt or therm of energy than the consumers' previous suppliers," the State alleged
The complaints allege violations of the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act, the Consumer Fraud Act, multiple regulations concerning energy licensing and registration, retail choice consumer protection, anti-slamming requirements, and advertising by energy suppliers, and/or the Plain Language Act.
Links to New Jersey Suits
• Palmco
• Hiko
• Systrum
"We hope that the filing of these actions sends a message to all potential wrongdoers that using fraud and deception to entice vulnerable consumers to switch energy suppliers will not pay," said Acting Director of Consumer Affairs Steve Lee.
The State also alleges that Palmco and HIKO engaged in slamming by switching customer gas and/or electric accounts without the consumers' knowledge and consent; as well as other unconscionable commercial practices. The Division of Consumer Affairs, the BPU, and the Better Business Bureau received a total of approximately 1,463 consumer complaints about the three companies.
"My fellow Commissioners and I are very troubled by some Third Party Suppliers' alleged marketing tactics and the lack of transparency in the terms of their agreements," said New Jersey Board of Public Utilities President Dianne Solomon. "While today's announced allegations against a few energy suppliers should send a clear message to the energy supply industry, consumers should understand that there is still a robust market of alternative energy suppliers to be considered that may offer savings on electric and gas bills."
The State is seeking restitution for affected consumers, as well as civil penalties, attorneys' fees and costs; as well as future adherence to all applicable marketing, advertising, and contract standards.
Specific allegations against each supplier include:
Palmco: "Further, in aggressive door-to-door and telephone solicitations, Palmco sales representatives induced consumers to enter into contracts based upon representations of competitive gas and electric rates. Palmco sales representatives stated to consumers that the rates would be up to 20 percent lower than the consumers' current energy supplier, or that the rates would never exceed those of the consumers' current energy supplier," the State alleged
"However, instead of delivering the represented 'competitive' monthly rates or savings, Palmco charged consumers far more per unit of energy than their prior utility companies. For example, for certain consumers, Palmco's charges per therm for natural gas increased from 83 percent to 712 percent above the rates charged by the consumers' prior utility. This resulted in monthly natural gas charges that, at times, were several hundred dollars more than the gas prices consumers would have paid if they had stayed with their previous energy supplier," the State alleged
"Palmco's sales representatives also engaged in overly aggressive and deceptive tactics, both in door-to-door and telephone solicitations. On various occasions, Palmco sales representatives claimed to be employed by or affiliated with the area utility company, failed to inform consumers that they were offering third-party energy supply services, and obtained customer signatures and account information under false pretenses. At times, Palmco sales representatives told consumers that they were investigating illegal overcharges by the consumers' current energy supplier – and requested account information and/or signatures on forms that turned out to be the Palmco contract. Palmco used such account information to switch consumers' gas and electric supply, without the consumers' knowledge or authorization," the State alleged
"At times, Palmco door-to-door sales representatives refused to provide consumers with an opportunity to read their contracts prior to signing, and/or covered the contract text except for the signature line. On other occasions, Palmco sales representatives convinced persons other than the account holder to sign contracts switching the existing account to Palmco's service," the State alleged
To date, BPU has received complaints from approximately 313 consumers about Palmco. The Division of Consumer Affairs has received complaints from approximately 42 consumers, and has received approximately 133 further consumer complaints from the Better Business Bureau, about Palmco.
HIKO: "However, instead of delivering the promised monthly savings, HIKO charged consumers far more than the utility companies – on average between 200 percent to 300 percent more per unit of energy, but as high as 710 percent more per kilowatt-hour. This resulted in monthly bills that were significantly higher than the consumers would have paid if they had stayed with their previous energy supplier," the State alleged
"HIKO switched certain customers to its service without authorization. In some door-to-door solicitations, HIKO sales representatives led consumers to believe they were affiliated with their area's utility company in efforts to induce the customers to enter into contracts with HIKO. Some sales representatives convinced persons other than the account holder to switch the account holders' electric and/or gas supply service. In other cases, HIKO sales representatives told consumers they could 'opt out' or cancel the HIKO contract at any time, but failed to inform consumers that it would take from 30 to 60 days, or one to two billing cycles, to end the charges from HIKO and switch back to their previous suppliers," the State alleged
"When consumers attempted to complain to HIKO, the company failed to respond to consumer complaints and inquiries, virtually providing no way for consumers to cancel their contracts in a timely manner and stop the exorbitant billing. Some consumers who attempted to reach a 'live person' at HIKO were only able to reach a voicemail box that was full and would not accept new messages. By failing to provide adequate customer service, HIKO was able to continue billing consumers at exorbitant rates," the State alleged
To date, BPU has received complaints from approximately 348 consumers about HIKO Energy. The Division of Consumer Affairs has received complaints from approximately 41 consumers, and has received an additional approximately 155 consumer complaints from the Better Business Bureau about HIKO.
Systrum: "In its marketing materials and advertisements, Systrum represented that it offered 'New Jersey's Lowest Residential Electric Rates' and promised savings of up to 20 percent on consumers' monthly electric and/or natural gas bills," the State alleged
"However, instead of delivering the promised monthly savings, Systrum charged consumers far more per unit of energy than the utility companies – as much as 300 percent more per kilowatt-hour. This resulted in monthly bills that were significantly higher than the consumers would have paid if they had stayed with their previous energy provider," the State alleged
"Systrum's advertisements also lured consumers with the false promise of 'no contracts,' in violation of BPU regulations. Despite this statement, Systrum did use contracts, certain of which contained various misrepresentations and omissions of material facts. For example, certain Systrum contracts did not include a required statement of the residential customer's rights or a complete list of fees, and some included the name 'PSE&G' even though PSE&G was not a party to the contract. In addition, certain Systrum contracts required consumers to waive all consumer rights under New Jersey law," the State alleged
"Consumers who sought to cancel their service were often unable to reach a live Systrum customer service representative. Consumers who did reach a representative were told they could not cancel without 30 days' notice – a requirement included in contracts that consumers had never signed or even seen," the State alleged
"After increasing consumers' energy bills drastically during the first two months of 2014, Systrum abruptly, and without proper notice, discontinued their services and reverted customers back to their original energy suppliers. At the same time, Systrum deactivated its website, leaving consumers without access to information," the State alleged
To date, BPU has received complaints from approximately 363 consumers about Systrum. The Division of Consumer Affairs has received complaints from approximately 55 consumers, and has received an additional approximately 13 consumer complaints from the Better Business Bureau about Systrum.
ADVERTISEMENT Search for more retail energy careers: Copyright 2010-
June 5, 2014
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-14 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
"Palmco's contracts stated that the price for natural gas service would be based on the monthly New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) closing prices for natural gas, and that the price for electric service would be based on monthly locational marginal prices (LMP) determined on a day-ahead or real-time basis. Despite these representations, Palmco's monthly charges for gas and/or electric were greatly in excess of the NYMEX and LMP closing prices and were not reflective of changes in those closing prices," the State alleged
"Certain HIKO contracts included the guarantee that consumers would realize monthly savings of from 1 to 7 percent, or in other cases up to 10 percent, during the first six months. In aggressive door-to-door and telephone solicitations, HIKO sales representatives represented to consumers that, after the first six months, rates would never exceed those of their current utility company," the State alleged
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Director of Sales and Business Development
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager
• NEW! -- Electricity Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Analyst I, Electricity Services
• NEW! -- Natural Gas Pipeline Scheduler
• NEW! -- B2B Regional Sales Rep -- Retail Supplier -- NY/NJ/PA
• NEW! -- Account Representative / Account Executive -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development/Sales -- Retail Supplier -- New York
• NEW! -- Senior Pricing & Structure Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Texas -- DFW
• NEW! -- Account Manager
• NEW! -- Energy Consultant / Analyst
• NEW! -- Vice President of Supply -- Retail Provider -- Houston
• NEW! -- VP/Director of Operations -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
RetailEnergyJobs.com
|
|
|
|