Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

PSC Directs Retail Suppliers To File Five-Year Resource Adequacy Plans

December 23, 2015

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-15 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Karen Abbott • kabbott@energychoicematters.com

As in prior years, the Michigan PSC has ordered electric utilities and other load-serving entities (LSEs), including retail suppliers, to file assessments of their plans for meeting customer loads during the 2016 to 2020 timeframe.

Each assessment should include the LSE’s expected peak demand and the resources available and committed to meet peak demand, including applicable regional transmission organization (RTO) requirements such as expected reserves by applying MISO’s 2016-2017 planning year reserve for each of the five years. Each assessment should justify the expected reserve margin in light of the LSE’s circumstances, including the reliability characteristics of its resource base and the characteristics and diversities of the customer load. Load forecasts should separately identify choice load and bundled load. Each assessment should also distinguish between in-state and out-of-state generation resources, and any applicable transmission service, and analyze how this generation is expected to serve customer demand and meet applicable RTO requirements such as MISO Module E requirements

Each assessment shall further provide details for each year regarding the actual deliverability of generation output and purchased power under peak operating conditions, and transmission capabilities and constraints or other factors such as pricing affecting deliverability and reliance on resources located in other RTOs or other resource zones within an RTO. Further, each assessment shall identify all supply side resources designated to meet reserve requirements for each year of the five year forecast – including generation units that are owned by the LSE affiliates or otherwise committed to serve the load, firm contract capacity supported by commitments of designated unit or system resources, and demand response or load curtailment measures – in sufficient detail (i.e., unit-level and contract-level information) to verify that no resource is being credited more than once toward the planning requirements of one or more load-serving entities. To the extent that the LSE plans to rely on the MISO capacity auction, other power purchase agreement (PPA) market purchases of capacity, or other capacity purchased from the market on an as-needed basis to meet some or all of its needs, the LSE should address potential pricing risks or transmission availability risks.

Case No. U-17992

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Structuring Analyst -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Manager, Commercial Client Services -- Retail Supplier -- Houston/DFW
NEW! -- Account Coordinator
NEW! -- Director of Commercial Structuring -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Customer Account Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Vice President and Regional General Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Program Director - $225K/yr -- Texas
NEW! -- Staff Accountant, Commissions Analysis -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Direct Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Supplier Services Manager

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-15 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search