Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Md. People's Counsel: PSC Should Gather Data On Rates Paid By Low-Income Customers on Competitive Supply, "Consider" Whether NY-Style Prohibition Needed

January 23, 2017

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-17 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The Maryland PSC should gather data on the electric rates paid by low-income customers to determine if a prohibition or other restrictions should be placed on shopping for an electricity supplier by low-income customers, the Maryland Office of People's Counsel said in comments filed with the PSC

OPC was commenting on a report filed in PC 47, which is examining the potential for an opt-in affinity program in the state (see story here). The report noted that New York and Pennsylvania have taken actions to prohibit or otherwise condition the ability of low-income customers to shop for a retail supplier

OPC noted that low-income customers participating in Maryland’s Electric Universal Service Program (EUSP) are currently permitted to purchase electricity from a retail supplier.

"While OPC does not object to EUSP customers continuing to do so at this time, it would be helpful to gauge whether EUSP participants purchasing electricity from retail suppliers are consuming more of the scarce EUSP benefits than would be the case if those customers had been receiving Standard Offer Service from their local utilities instead," OPC said

"As a result, OPC recommends that the Commission consider gathering the data needed to consider whether similar reforms are appropriate here in Maryland. In order to accomplish this, OPC recommends that the Commission direct Baltimore Gas & Electric, Pepco, Delmarva Power, SMECO, and Potomac Edison to report how many of their EUSP customers receive electric supply from a retail supplier, and how much those customers are paying for that electricity each month," OPC said

The OPC made a similar request in a proceeding considering the annual EUSP plan (see story here); the PSC did not specifically address OPC's request at that time

For a variety of reasons, including those stated in the consultant report (see story here), OPC said that a state-endorsed opt-in affinity program was not appropriate at this time, and expressed concerns with the consultant's recommendations for two potential opt-in pilots (proposed to be run by a low-income agency or a municipality)

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Marketing Associate -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Directors: Telemarketing or Broker Channel Management - Retail Electric Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Analysts, Sales and Marketing - Retail Electric Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Market Director -- Retail Energy
NEW! -- Energy Business Development Professional
NEW! -- Managers, Sales and Marketing - Retail Electric Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Director, Wholesale & Retail Electricity Operations
NEW! -- Director, Finance & Operations
NEW! -- Sales Support Specialist -- -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Sales Associate -- Retail Energy
NEW! -- Energy Sales Rep
NEW! -- Channel Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Sales/Pricing Support Coordinator
NEW! -- Marketing Coordinator
NEW! -- Channel Partner Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Retail Energy Sales

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search