Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

New N.Y. PSC Chair: Action Moving Evidentiary Hearing Process Forward, "Signals The End Of An ESCO Market That Provides No Value To Customers"

PSC Moves Forward With Retail Evidentiary Hearing Process


August 3, 2017

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-17 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

In rejecting interlocutory appeals of several rulings concerning the scope and procedure for its retail mass market evidentiary hearing process, the New York PSC denied requests to suspend or terminate the evidentiary phase of the proceeding and affirmed that the evidentiary hearing process will move forward

The rejection of the interlocutory appeals had been first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com yesterday morning

In its decision, the PSC rejected the April 12, 2017 request by the Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA), and an earlier request by Direct Energy Services, to suspend or terminate the pending evidentiary hearing phase of the mass market review, currently slated to begin in October.

"The record is clear that certain ESCO customers have paid much more for their energy than necessary, and instead exposes them to the risks of overcharging," said Commission Chair John B. Rhodes in a news release.

"We have cracked down on bad-acting ESCOs, and we have banned ESCOs from serving low-income consumers. This action signals the end of an ESCO market that provides no value to customers, and instead exposes them to the risks of overcharging. The next step we will take is to explore whether and how ESCOs can truly provide energy services and value to New Yorkers in support of Governor Cuomo’s Reforming the Energy Vision," Rhodes said

As reported in our alert yesterday, the PSC affirmed the ALJs' ruling that discovery related to the commercial and industrial retail market is appropriate. The PSC also affirmed the ALJs' ruling that discovery related to ESCO profitability is appropriate

The PSC found that the process initiating the evidentiary hearing, including an initial Secretarial notice and subsequent ALJ rulings, were appropriate. ESCOs had called the notices procedurally deficient

However, to put the issue to rest, the PSC in an order denying the interlocutory appeal also explicitly authorizes the full evidentiary hearing process

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Senior Energy Advisor
NEW! -- Branch Manager -- Energy Sales
NEW! -- Energy Advisor
NEW! -- Director of Supply -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Operations Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Indirect Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier -- DFW
NEW! -- Manager, Supply & Pricing -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- EDI Transactions Manager -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Senior Pricing & Structuring Analyst -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Manager, Billing -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Pricing Analyst -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Operations Supervisor -- Retail Supplier -- Houston

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search