Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Texas PUC Imposes Higher, $1.75 Million Penalty On Retail Electric Provider

March 30, 2018

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-17 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

The Texas PUC adopted an order imposing an administrative penalty on TruSmart Energy LLC for what the order said was, "failing to timely remit payment to five transmission and distribution utilities (TDUs) under the terms of its tariff with each."

The PUC's final order rejected the proposed fine of $1.1 million as recommended by an ALJ in a proposal for decision, and instead the PUC in its final order imposed an administrative penalty of $1.75 million. The ALJ's proposed penalty had equaled the amount that TruSmart had failed to pay the TDUs

"The Commission finds the mitigating factors relied on by the SOAH ALJ in recommending the lower penalty amount of $1,135,674.93 unpersuasive. In particular, the Commission rejects the ALJ's contention that because no TruSmart customer lost power, TruSmart should be subject to a lower penalty. Had any TruSmart customer lost power as a result of TruSmart's defaults, TruSmart would have been subject to additional penalties for committing a separate violation," the PUC said in its order

The $1.75 million amount had been recommended by PUC Staff, and the PUC in its order noted that, "Commission Staff also provided testimony explaining that it based its proposed penalty on the factors listed in 16 TAC § 22.246 and the following facts, among others: (1) the large amount of the default to the TDUs; (2) that ratepayers will ultimately bear the burden of repaying the TDUs; and (3) that TruSmart made no efforts to correct the violation and will not repay the TDUs."

"After weighing the factors set out in PURA § 15.023(c) and 16 TAC § 22.246(c)(3), the Commission finds that an administrative penalty of $1,750,000 is appropriate, and that there are no mitigating factors justifying a lower penalty amount," the PUC said in its order

"A significant administrative penalty is required to deter TruSmart, should it ever re-enter the market, and other REPs from defaulting on financial obligations to TDUs," the PUC said in its order

Docket 46093

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Energy Consultant
NEW! -- Director, Retail Energy Supply & Pricing -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Sales and Channel Partner Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Sr. Energy Analyst -- Broker -- DFW
NEW! -- Commercial Energy Advisor
NEW! -- Energy Broker
NEW! -- Business Development Manager - Texas, Retail Provider
NEW! -- Account Manager, Retail Energy -- DFW
NEW! -- Operations Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Business Development Manager - Northeastern US, Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Senior or Principal Quantitative Research Analyst, Energy Commodity/Risk

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search