Energy Choice
                            

Matters

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Texas PUC Staff Oppose New Charges On Retail Electric Providers Proposed By TDU

August 21, 2018

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-17 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas have filed testimony opposing Texas-New Mexico Power's proposal, in its current rate case, to institute a new Inadvertent Gain fee and a new fee for a meter reading for purpose of a mass transition

TNMP's proposal of the new fees applicable to REPs had been first exclusively reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com in May (see story here)

PUCT Staff said in testimony that the proposed Inadvertent Gain fee should be rejected because, "TNMP has failed to meet its burden of proof regarding the new fee."

"The direct testimony and application submitted by TNMP includes a single sentence noting that TNMP is proposing the new fee. The rate filing package submitted contains a single spreadsheet showing the calculation of the proposed fee. TNMP has not provided any justification or support for the proposed new fee. In light of this lack of support provided in its direct case, it is my opinion that TNMP has failed to meet its burden of proof to initiate a new discretionary service charge," a witness for Staff testified

Similarly, Staff testified that TNMP's proposal to increase its mass transition fee should be rejected, as Staff testified that, "TNMP provided no support for its proposal to begin charging for this service, and therefore has not met its burden of proof."

"Additionally, TNMP's proposal appears to conflict with the Provider of Last Resort (POLR) rule, 16 TAC § 25.43(p)(16)," Staff testified

Staff noted in testimony that 16 TAC § 25.43(p)(16) provides that a TDU shall create a regulatory asset for the TDU fees associated with a mass transition, and that such rule states that the TDU shall not bill as a discretionary charge, the costs included in this regulatory asset, which shall consist of the following: (A) fees for out-of-cycle meter reads associated with the mass transition of customer to a POLR provider; and (B) fees for the first out-of-cycle meter read provided to a customer who transfers away from a POLR provider, when the out-of-cycle meter read is performed within 60 calendar days of the date of the mass transition.

Staff also testified that TNMP's proposed Rider AVM - Rate Case Additional Vegetation Management should be denied because it constitutes unauthorized piecemeal ratemaking and because it is not based on historical costs, but rather prospective in nature and therefore not known and measurable.

Staff also testified that TNMP's proposed 4CP Distribution System Charge rate design for Transmission Service customers should be rejected, and the standard Commission-approved NCP rate design should be implemented for Transmission Service customers.

Staff also opposed TNMP's proposal to adjust the class allocation of transmission expenses in the TCRF rider

TNMP proposes to adjust the allocation of the FERC account 565 so that no customer class gets more than 150% of the system increase, which equates to a 19.77% change. This means that TNMP has adjusted the 4CP demand allocators used to allocate transmission costs so that no class would experience a rate increase greater than 19.77%.

Staff testified that, "Approval of TNMP's request would constitute a departure from Commission precedent in the allocation of wholesale transmission costs. which requires an allocation based on actual, unadjusted 4CP demand coincident with the ERCOT 4CP. TNMP's request is also inconsistent with 16 TAC § 25.192(b)(1) and (d), as well as PURA 35.004 (d), which require transmission cost recovery based on ERCOT 4CP."

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Manager, Power Supply -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Pricing Analyst -- Houston
NEW! -- Renewable Energy Sales Representative -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
Commercial Accounts Support Specialist -- Retail Supplier
Sales Executive

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search