|
|
|
|
PUC Endorses Time Of Use Rates For Default Service, Sees Service As "Benchmark" For Dynamic Retail Offerings
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
As part of a "roadmap" of its PowerForward grid modernization investigation, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has generally endorsed Time of Use rates for electricity default service (Standard Service Offer, SSO)
The roadmap does not make any final decisions and is not binding on the Commission
"The Commission believes that the benefits associated with competitively bid SSO rates can be expanded through the implementation of SSO time-of-use rates that utilize advanced meter data. TOU rates should be designed or modified to incent customers to reduce consumption during peak periods and to engage customers in making informed decisions about their energy usage, regardless of whether customers are shopping for their electric supply or on the SSO rate," the roadmap states
"For instance, as referenced earlier, as the deployment
of EV charging infrastructure grows, TOU rates
should incent off-peak charging for customers
with an EV. In addition, TOU rates may provide
a benchmark for more dynamic products and
services in the retail market as they develop," the roadmap states
"The Commission encourages, in parallel with
advanced meter deployment, that each EDU
propose or amend an existing TOU rate design
for SSO customers, which may include: real time
pricing, block and index pricing, TOU pricing,
variable peak pricing, critical peak pricing, and/
or critical peak rebates. Further, the on-peak/
off-peak ratio should be sufficient to provide
a response from participating customers and
the peak period duration and frequency should
reasonably allow for participation from customers
on the rate. The proposal may also include a
rebate program for enabling technologies (e.g.
smart thermostats) which can be paired with TOU
rates offered through the SSO or through CRES
provider offerings that utilize time-based pricing," the roadmap states
"The Commission envisions that each EDU
proposal would include plans for marketing and
education of the TOU rate design to customers,
along with options for informing customers of
available TOU offerings through the PUCO’s Energy
Choice Ohio website," the roadmap states
Turning to the broader issue of grid modernization, the roadmap envisions utilities creating a uniform platform to allow the offering of various products and services by third parties, stating "In order to realize the policy objectives for
PowerForward, the Commission believes that
each EDU should work towards developing a
cyber-physical platform consisting of uniform core
components, so that the foundation for customer
engagement and market participation in providing
innovative products and services is set in the
state. The goal of a uniform platform is to enable
a variety of market opportunities, regardless of
service territory, and to create efficiencies that can
be passed along to customers either through the
proliferation of a more diverse set of retail market
offerings or through cost savings associated with
the different types of products and services. Further,
utilities should explore whether they can share
among themselves some of the investments of the
cyber-physical platform, as doing so will promote
certain PowerForward principles and objectives."
The roadmap states, "It is further noted that, given the restructured
retail electricity market in Ohio, standardized
access to customer energy usage data (CEUD)
for CRES providers and other third parties
should be viewed as a fundamental and core
component of the platform, along with the
deployment of advanced customer metering."
The roadmap states, "Arguably, the pursuit of an enhanced customer
experience through innovation is more likely to
succeed in the competitive marketplace than
in a regulated environment. Assuming utility
deployment of foundational assets through an
architectural construct that provides access to
non-utilities, innovative products and services
can then be introduced. The introduction of non-regulated
capital investment would mitigate
the need for economic regulation and recovery,
and more equitably allocate costs to those
consumers who find net value in the product
or service offered. If barriers to market entry
are minimized, ample incentive should exist to
attract non-EDU participants into the market."
"Therefore, for behind the meter grid modernization
customer applications, it is recommended that
the current retail marketplace structure should
prevail. Assigning the opportunity for behind the
meter customer applications to competitive forces,
whether CRES providers, third-party technology
or other trusted customer advisors, is consistent
with traditional behind the meter limitations
on regulatory jurisdiction. These competitors
could include EDU affiliates with appropriate
corporate separation safeguards to eliminate
the possibility of competitive advantage," the roadmap states
However, the roadmap envisions that a role for utility provisions of behind-the-meter solutions may be necessary if the market does not develop solutions for certain customers, stating, "Markets will develop where opportunities exist.
However, without the safety net of regulated
recovery mechanisms to reduce investment risk,
markets will develop at different paces dictated by
the scope of opportunity for return on investment
and economic margin. It is possible that social
policy may dictate a faster pace, a jump start, or
assisted development in what would otherwise
be an underserved customer segment. In these
circumstances, where market development is
slower than the pace desired by implementation
of a desired social policy, it may be advisable
to permit EDU market participation behind the
meter for a limited period, with as minimal a
scale possible to advance that social policy."
"There should be two such social policy justifications
that would allow an EDU to participate in providing
behind the meter customer applications: (i) in
circumstances where there is social inequity in the
deployment of customer applications; and (ii) in
circumstances where the application is deemed crucial to advance the state, but the marketplace
has not developed to allow for that application
to be deployed competitively to customers—a
necessity and timing nexus must exist for this
second justification. Further, the Commission
would provide due consideration, in very limited
circumstances, to a request by an EDU to deploy
for residential customers only, a behind the meter
application of minimal invasion and cost that is
deemed essential for residential customers to realize
the benefits of grid architecture investments," the roadmap states
"The Commission believes this backstop should
exist to promote the PowerForward principle
Enhance the Experience for All. The state has
already seen an example of how market forces
may delay the extension of essential technology to
all Ohioans in the context of broadband services.
The Commission hopes to provide a backstop to
avoid this situation in the electricity context. If
such a social policy justification is triggered, the
Commission encourages EDUs to partner with
CRES providers or other third parties that could
serve to both deploy the application efficiently and
reduce the public cost burden of deployment," the roadmap states
Concerning applications in front of the meter, the roadmap states, "As the Commission has expressed a principle
of Do No Harm and a grid objective of
maintaining a Strong Grid, the Commission
believes that EDUs should maintain their role
regarding access to the distribution system for
applications in front of the meter. Whether access
is intended to implement a distribution system
improvement or a customer-specific application,
the EDU owns and must be the caretaker of
the distribution system in order to advance the
PowerForward principles and objectives."
"It is possible that an intended customer-specific
application could occur in front of the meter that
is either divorced from, or co-mingled with system
betterment. For a purely customer intended
application without system betterment, the
customer should be able to choose the entity who
provides that application. EDUs should endeavor
to provide reasonable access to a CRES provider or
other third party that is installing such a customer
application, and can require that certain system
requirements be met upon installation as our EDUs
are ultimately responsible for system reliability," the roadmap states
Concerning customer data and settlement, the roadmap states, "For shopping customers, the implementation of grid
modernization technologies should remove barriers
between the wholesale and retail markets. The
deployment of AMI, including smart and advanced
meters enables the provision of the type and
granularity of data needed to align retail charges
with the wholesale market costs for generation.
However, there are also barriers associated with
the settlement of the data by the load serving
entity and the current methods, or lack thereof, for accessing the data by market participants."
"Going forward, CEUD should be made available in
a way that allows for the monetization of changes
in an individual customer’s energy and usage,
including the potential to provide services through
the installation of DERs as market opportunities
continue to develop. In the short term, the
Commission believes that the EDUs should calculate
and settle the following values on an individual basis
for all customers with smart meters: total hourly
energy obligation (THEO), peak load contribution
(PLC) and network service peak load (NSPL)," the roadmap states
The roadmap envisions a workgroup to address the following:
• Allow customers to obtain real-time, or
near real-time, access to CEUD through the
connection of qualified home area network
(HAN) devices to the customer’s smart meter.
• Prescribe a uniform methodology across the
EDUs for third parties to obtain CEUD. This should
include a method for CRES providers to obtain
the THEO, PLC and NSPL values referenced above.
The roadmap would institute a variety of additional work groups and collaboratives to address the issues covered under the roadmap
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
PUC Envisions Utilities Actively Marketing Default Service TOU, Rebates For Enabling Tech (Smart Thermostats)
PUC: "May Be Advisable" For Utilities To Offer Behind-The-Meter Services Under Certain Circumstances
August 30, 2018
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-17 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Channel Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sr Analyst, Supply and Pricing -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• NEW! -- Customer Retention Analyst -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• NEW! -- Energy Market Analyst - Pricing & Trading
• NEW! -- Manager, Power Supply -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Renewable Energy Sales Representative -- Retail Supplier
|
|
|