|
|
|
|
Retail Supplier Enters Settlement Agreement With Regulatory Staff Concerning Alleged Slamming
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Vista Energy Marketing, L.P. would pay $4,000 under a settlement agreement with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement (I&E) to resolve four alleged instances of slamming
The matter was opened as a result of the PUC's Bureau of Consumer Services (BCS) receipt of six allegations from customers that their electric generation service had been switched to Vista without the customers’ authorization
In each complaint, once Vista became aware of the mistaken enrollments, it took immediate corrective action, including cancelling the complainants’ enrollment with Vista, ensuring that no charges were assessed to the complainants, including crediting or re-rating the customer as necessary, and punishing the agents accordingly.
The settlement agreement states that, "Vista acknowledges that due to the success of its event marketing enrollments, its increased sales volume challenged its QA [quality assurance] resources. As a result, it developed what it considered to be a more risk-oriented approach to QA by utilizing algorithms that were designed to identify higher risk sales. This approach to QA was used in limited circumstances when higher sales volume prevented one hundred percent QA review of TPVs. On January 25, 2018, Vista resumed its previous practice of having one hundred percent of TPVs reviewed by a QA agent."
As a result of an investigation, I&E was prepared to allege that in four instances, the customer had their electric generation supplier switched to Vista without the authorization of the customer.
"I&E found that this likely occurred as a result of Vista incorporating its risk-oriented approach to QA, as discussed ... above. I&E’s investigation did not reveal any other instances where residential customers had their electric generation service switched to Vista without the customer’s authorization," the settlement states
In addition to the $4,000 civil penalty, Vista agreed to various remedial measures to resolve the matter.
Among such measures are:
• For each third-party vendor with whom Vista seeks to
engage in business, Vista will affirmatively inquire
about whether the agents, whose actions are the cause
of this present matter, is employed by or associated
with the company.
• For a term of twelve (12) months starting after the date
of entry of the Commission’s order approving
settlement in this matter, Vista shall provide to BCS
staff, in the first week of each calendar quarter, a
report for the prior quarter that captures the following
data concerning customer complaints filed directly
with Vista: (1) the number of complaints by category,
i.e. slamming, do-not-call list violations, incorrect
charges, etc.; and (2) any process improvements,
organizational changes, etc. that were implemented to
reduce or eliminate similar complaints going forward.
In a statement in support of the settlement agreement, Vista said as follows: "Vista has taken steps to ensure that the circumstances that led to this investigation will not
be repeated. Specifically, Vista took immediate corrective action once it became aware of the
mistaken enrollments at issue in this matter. Vista ensures that no charges were assessed to any of
the Complainants and removed the agents responsible for the mistaken enrollments. Moreover,
Vista implemented increased quality assurance (“QA”) protocols in response to the complaints to
prevent unauthorized sales from becoming actual enrollments."
In a statement in support of the settlement agreement, Vista further said that: "As fully explained in the Settlement Agreement, Vista has also taken steps to amend its
policies and procedures to prevent reoccurrence. Vista requires review of 100% of its third-party
verifications ('TPVs') to ensure that customers are voluntarily switching to Vista. Vista regularly
audits all of its enrollments to ensure compliance with Pennsylvania regulations and requirements.
As such, Vista is in compliance with the Commission’s regulations and has taken substantial action
to prevent future potential violations of Commission regulations."
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
March 6, 2019
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-19 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Chief Operating Officer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Retail Energy Channel Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Energy Sales Broker
• Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• Business Development Manager
|
|
|