|
|
|
|
Texas PUC Staff Recommend Retaining Low System-Wide Offer Cap In ERCOT Market In Draft Proposal For Adoption
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas have filed a draft proposal for adoption in a rulemaking concerning discrete changes to the scarcity pricing rules
Among other things, Staff's draft proposal for adoption retains the current Low System-Wide Offer Cap (LCAP) of $2,000 per MWh, which would be imposed if the Peaker Net Margin threshold were to be reached, and suspends the Operating Reserve Demand Curve and the Reliability Deployment Price Adder if the LCAP is in effect, with the intention of preventing divergence between the real-time and day-ahead markets if the LCAP is ever activated
As first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com (see story here), several generators had proposed eliminating the Low System-Wide Offer Cap
In a draft preamble, Staff proposes the following language: "The commission declines to eliminate the LCAP at this time. The commission notes that the LCAP has been in place since 2006, and the interests of the market as a whole are served by continuity and the regulatory certainty provided by the LCAP."
Furthermore, Staff recommends that the Commission decline to increase the LCAP at this time. Generators had proposed raising the LCAP to $4,500/MWh
"The commission adopted the
current LCAP value at the same time as the current High System-Wide Offer Cap of $9,000
per MWh, and has historically raised the LCAP only in tandem with the increases to the
High System-Wide Offer Cap. The commission is not revising the High System-Wide Offer
Cap in this project, and the commission is not persuaded that a change to the LCAP is necessary at this time. The commission will consider the VOLL in Project No. 48540," a Staff draft preamble states
PUCT Staff also recommended rejecting a proposal from retail electric providers to include day-ahead market prices or ancillary services revenues in the Peaker Net Margin calculation.
"These metrics do not reflect the goal of the Peaker
Net Margin, which is to calculate revenues that a peaking unit would receive. The Peaker
Net Margin threshold is intended to be a high barrier to ensure that generators have sufficiently recovered revenues before the LCAP is imposed," a Staff draft preamble states
Staff does propose amending the rule to state that, if the Peaker Net Margin threshold is reached in a year, ERCOT will not apply
any administrative price adders, and that energy prices, exclusive of congestion prices, will
not exceed the LCAP plus $1 for the remainder of the calendar year. This change will
mitigate market distortions. The commission does not intend for elements such as the shadow
price caps or the Power Balance Penalty Curve to be suspended with the imposition of the
LCAP. "The commission does intend that the reliability deployment price adder and the
ORDC be suspended with the imposition of the LCAP," a Staff draft preamble states
"With respect to parties comments asserting that the commission should direct ERCOT to
continue applying the ORDC, the commission declines to make this change and adopts the
rule as proposed in this respect. The Peaker Net Margin threshold is intentionally set to be a
high, conservative barrier at which generators would have more than recovered their costs
and at which loads would be in need of relief from sustained and significant high pricing.
Revenues from the ORDC are included in the Peaker Net Margin calculation," a Staff draft preamble states
"With respect to parties' comments asserting that the commission should direct ERCOT to
continue applying the reliability deployment price adder, the commission declines to make
this change and adopts the rule as proposed in this respect. As with the ORDC, a conservative
approach to the Peaker Net Margin, as discussed earlier, merits an equally balanced
approach where loads are provided appropriate relief from sustained and significant high
prices," a Staff draft preamble states
Staff said that the proposal for adoption makes the following changes to the current rule:
• Replaces references to the Houston Ship Channel Gas Price Index with more flexible
language that references a natural gas price index value to be determined by ERCOT,
with the intention of allowing the ERCOT stakeholder process to select an index that
best reflects current natural gas market dynamics;
• Retains the current Low System-Wide Offer Cap (LCAP) of $2,000 per MWh, which
would be imposed if the Peaker Net Margin threshold were to be reached, and
suspends the Operating Reserve Demand Curve and the Reliability Deployment Price
Adder if the LCAP is in effect, with the intention of preventing divergence between
the real-time and day-ahead markets if the LCAP is ever activated;
• Updates rule language and reporting requirements to reflect current practices and add
more descriptive terms that are currently used in the ERCOT Protocols; and
• Repeals §25.508 (prior HCAP rule), which became obsolete when the Commission amended §25.505 in 2012.
Project 48721
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-16 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
Would Not Increase Level For LCAP
April 12, 2019
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-19 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Retail Energy Operations Analyst
• NEW! -- Retail Energy Operations Specialist
• NEW! -- Account Manager, Energy Choice
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager
• Chief Operating Officer -- Retail Supplier
• Retail Energy Channel Manager -- Retail Supplier
|
|
|