Proposed Order Addresses Attorney General's Request To Increase Billing Fee On Retail Suppliers
Proposed Order Would Change Priority For Retail Supplier Charges In Partial Payment Situations
July 26, 2019 Email This Story Copyright 2010-19 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • firstname.lastname@example.org
The following story is brought free of charge to readers byEC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
A proposed order from three Illinois ALJs in Nicor's natural gas rate case would reject a proposal from the Illinois Attorney General to increase the Nicor billing charge applicable to third party providers, including retail suppliers
Nicor Gas currently charges Customer Select (choice) suppliers $0.25 per bill for the provision of billing service.
Alleging an increase in Nicor's billing costs, the AG had sought to increase the billing fee for third-party providers to $0.36 per bill
In a proposed order, the ALJs would find that, "the Company should conduct a cost study related to the billing service charge before imposing a 45% increase in the per-bill charge to Customer Select suppliers for billing service."
"The Company has committed to providing an updated analysis of the cost of third-party billing service in its next rate case, and the Commission finds that Nicor Gas’ proposal provides a reasonable course of action to address this issue. Therefore, the Commission finds the AG’s proposal to increase rates for third-party billing services to be inappropriate and premature at this time and declines to adopt it, as well as the AG’s corresponding proposal to impute additional Test Year revenues based on that increase," the proposed order states
The proposed order also addresses payment priority in partial payment situations.
Currently, when customers make partial payments of their utility bills, Nicor Gas applies a priority protocol to determine which components of the customer’s bill will be fulfilled using the partial payment. If the customer is subject to disconnection, Nicor Gas first applies the partial payment to fulfill any of the customer’s obligations to Nicor Gas that will defer or avoid the disconnection process. If the customer is not subject to disconnection, or if disconnection can be deferred or avoided, Nicor Gas applies the partial payment to the customer’s obligations in the following order: first to fulfill any obligation to maintain a deposit with Nicor Gas; second, to any obligations under a Deferred Payment Arrangement or a Medical Payment Arrangement; third, on a pro rata basis to Nicor Gas and warranty charges that are past-due; fourth, on a pro rata basis to third-party supplier charges that are past-due; fifth, on a pro rata basis to Nicor Gas and warranty charges that are not past-due; and finally, on a pro rata basis to third-party supplier charges that are not past-due.
The AG had argued that Nicor Gas' current practice of prioritizing payments for warranty services on equal footing with current Nicor Gas charges on a pro rata basis, and above third-party past-due and current supplier charges (1) contradicts a prior Commission order; and (2) exposes customers to late fees, collection action and potential gas service shut-off, in violation of 83 Ill. Adm. Code Part 280.
The AG cited a prior ICC order which had held that, "Payments should be applied first to any overdue regulated charges, then to overdue supplier charges, next, to current regulated charges, and finally, to any current supplier charges. We agree that payment of overdue regulated charges is paramount to insure continued service to customers. However, it is of equal importance that suppliers remain in the market to allow competition to flourish. We believe that this can only be accomplished if suppliers are assured of payment."
In the proposed order, the ALJs agreed that the order cited by the AG prioritizes utility service charges over non-utility service charges.
"The plain language of the Order is clear that payments to gas suppliers must be prioritized with past due charges from the utility otherwise the market will not remain competitive," the ALJs said
Accordingly, the ALJs proposed that the Commission direct Nicor Gas to modify its Customer Choice tariff language to prioritize partial payments as follows: (1) overdue regulated charges; (2) overdue supplier charges; (3) current regulated charges; and (4) current supplier charges.
Nicor Gas also provides third-party billing services to Pivotal Home Solutions (PHS), an unaffiliated company that sells warranty services products
The AG, making allegations concerning PHS’s record of customer dissatisfaction including a class-action lawsuit, had requested that the Commission prohibit Nicor Gas from including PHS charges on customer bills, or, in the alternative, subjecting PHS to a code of conduct similar to that applied to retail energy suppliers
The ALJs would find that the information cited by the AG, as presented in the record, "does not warrant a Commission action prohibiting Nicor Gas from including PHS charges on customer bills at this time."
"However, in an attempt to appropriately examine the claims presented by the AG, the Commission directs Staff to file a Staff Report within 120 days recommending whether the Commission should open a formal investigation addressing Nicor Gas’ Third Party Billing Tariff, as it pertains to PHS. Following the conclusion of Staff’s report, if a docketed proceeding is warranted, the AG’s proposed code of conduct and disclaimer shall be considered at that time," the ALJs said
The proposed order also addressed an uncontested issue related to a natural gas storage study
In a 2017 rate case, the Commission directed Nicor to prepare a study assessing the implications of how Traditional Transportation customers and Customer Select suppliers use Nicor's on-system storage under the current terms and conditions of service, and to present the results of the study in its next rate case. Nicor Gas reports that it prepared that study, which concluded that Customer Select and Transportation customers currently use Nicor Gas’ eight aquifer storage facilities in a manner that does not support the short- and long-term reliability of those facilities. Nicor explained that, even though these customers comply with current tariffs and practices, their patterns of storage utilization conflict with optimal storage cycling needed to sustain the operational integrity of the aquifer storage fields, and that action is needed to preserve the reliability and integrity of the storage facilities. Nicor Gas states that it continues to analyze methods for resolving these issues.
Parties in the case agreed that Nicor should initiate a separate proceeding to consider proposals to remedy the problem identified in the storage study by June 30, 2020. The ALJs would approve this agreement, and the conclusions of the storage study are not addressed substantively in the current rate case