|
|
|
|
Retail Choice Regulator Opens Proceeding On "Energy Affordability"; Part Of Modern Grid Investigation
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
The Connecticut PURA has opened a number of specific proceedings as part of a larger grid modernization docket, including a new proceeding on energy affordability for all customer classes in Connecticut
With respect to energy affordability, the Authority’s investigation seeks to: (1) identify the most impactful barriers to increased energy affordability and equity in the state; and (2) potential solutions to those barriers.
The Authority said in an interim decision that it understands the following to be the most impactful barriers to address to achieve increased energy affordability and equity in the state:
Identifying customer eligibility
• For residential customers: identifying customers eligible for existing programs is difficult as it requires coordination between government and non-governmental entities, raising questions involving data-sharing and customer privacy protocols.
• For commercial and industrial customers: data on business customers struggling with energy affordability is not currently tracked to the Authority’s knowledge.
Lack of customer education and inter-organization coordination
• Customers have to visit several websites or locations to find all options for lowering their energy cost burden, including community action, government, energy efficiency, and distributed generation program websites
Rate design
• Electric rates are often regressive. Other states, including in the New England region, have investigated progressive rate design options to account for a more equitable distribution of costs
Definition of hardship customers and services provided to hardship customers
• Once identified, hardship customers do not benefit from mandatory, comprehensive education on the options to reduce their energy cost burden
Specific areas are impacted more than others
• Environmental justice communities are more heavily impacted and communities without access to natural gas heating may be more heavily impacted.
• In some instances, commercial and industrial customers interconnecting to the distribution grid for the first time or expanding existing load may require distribution system capacity upgrades, thus incurring high costs while delivering benefits to all future load
PURA said that potential solutions to the barriers above include, but are not limited to:
• A common website linking programs and measures to lower customers’ energy cost burden;
• Incentives related to decoupling to encourage the EDCs to educate hardship customer on options to reduce their energy costs;
• Environmental justice community and other heat maps based on types of areas identified above;
• Electric storage-backed microgrids in environmental justice communities;
• Innovative pairings of DERs and current DER programs to avoid or defer distribution system capacity upgrades; and
• Advanced rate design
The energy affordability docket is Docket 17-12-03-RE01
PURA also opened new proceedings on the following topics (Docket 17-12-03 with the following re-opened 'RE' numbers):
Phase II - Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2019
• RE01 Energy Affordability
• RE02 Advanced Metering Infrastructure
• RE03 Electric Storage
• RE04 Zero Emission Vehicles
• RE05 Innovative Technology Applications and Programs (Innovation Pilots)
• RE06 Interconnection Standards and Practices
Phase III - Beginning in the first half of 2020
• RE07 Non-Wires Alternatives
• RE08 Resilience and Reliability Standards and Programs
• RE09 Distributed Energy Resource Analysis and Program Reviews
Phase IV - Beginning at the completion of DEEP’s IRP / a Final Decision in RE01
• RE010 Building Blocks of Resource Adequacy and Clean Electric Supply
• RE011 New Rate Design
Concerning resource adequacy, PURA noted in an interim decision that Executive Order 3, signed by Governor Lamont on September 3, 2019, directs DEEP to, "analyze pathways and recommended strategies for achieving a 100% zero
carbon target for the electric sector by 2040" in the IRP, in consultation with the
Authority.
"Delivering one hundred percent zero carbon electricity would fundamentally change how resource adequacy and reliability are operationally maintained and which bulk power resources provide ancillary services. As directed by EO3, the Authority will consult with DEEP in the evaluation of how a one hundred percent zero carbon goal will effect resource adequacy and reliability in the State and proactively consider approaches to best integrate this future," PURA said
PURA further said, "The Authority will focus on providing guidance and input to the following questions: (1) how will increased renewable energy deployment affect the state and region’s need for increased ancillary services (i.e. flexible load and generation); and (2) what are the state-level solutions for ensuring resource adequacy under these scenarios and for providing zero carbon ancillary services?"
Concerning rate design, PURA said, "The purpose of tiered tax structures based on income level is to more equitably
share the tax burden across all income levels. The design is justified by its proponents
on the basis that individuals with lower incomes are more heavily impacted by the same
tax rate as compared to individuals with higher incomes, given that the same tax rate
disproportionately impacts the disposable income and ability to pay of lower income
individuals."
"Electric rates are traditionally designed differently. Increased electricity usage is
generally charged at the same rate for all customers of a specific customer class. For
electric rates, customer class is defined by usage and type of customer (e.g. residential,
commercial, or industrial), not by income level. Thus, ratepayers subject to lower income
or tight operating margins pay a disproportionate amount of their disposable income on
electricity compared with higher income individuals and businesses with the same
electricity use," PURA said
"The question of new rate designs more closely aligned with how tax rates are structured is highly nuanced and cannot be considered in a vacuum. While it is a good idea to explore new ways to more equitably distribute costs, the Authority is mindful of the consequences to all other customers of any changes to electric rates. The Authority will seek the knowledge and experience of the EDCs, as well as local and national experts, and leverage any lessons learned from Docket Nos. 17-12-03RE01 and 17-13-03RE11. The Authority will lean on the experience of the OCC, the Limited Income Energy Advisory
Board members, the CIEC, and all other representatives of customer classes in the State
in investigating and evaluating potential solutions in this reopened docket," PURA said
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-19 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
New Rate Designs To Be Examined
Opens Review Of Resource Adequacy In Light Of State's Carbon Goals
Also Opens New Proceedings On AMI, Storage, DERs, EVs
October 10, 2019
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-19 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Channel Partner Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Channel Partner Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sr. Energy Analyst -- DFW
• NEW! -- Channel Manager - Retail Division -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sr. Accountant -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• NEW! -- Senior Counsel -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• NEW! -- Operations/Settlement Analyst
• NEW! -- Retail Energy Supply RFP Coordinator
• NEW! -- Jr. Gas & Power Scheduler/Trader -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• NEW! -- Marketing Coordinator -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
• Corporate Counsel - Retail Supplier
• Senior Counsel - Regulatory - Retail Supplier
• Sales Representative -- Retail Supplier
|
|
|