|
|
|
|
PUC Approves Settlement Under Which Retail Supplier Will Pay $126,000 Forfeiture
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio approved a stipulation between Tomorrow Energy Corporation and PUCO Staff under which Tomorrow Energy agrees to a forfeiture of $126,000 to resolve certain alleged violations related to the enrollment process
Tomorrow Energy issued the following statement to EnergyChoiceMatters.com concerning the matter:
"Tomorrow Energy takes matters such as these very seriously. We very much appreciate the work done by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO). Tomorrow Energy believes it has always operated in good faith within the rules. We agreed to this settlement in order to focus our full attention on serving our customers in Ohio and continuing to lead the way in Ohio’s transition to renewable energy."
--- Statement from Tomorrow Energy
In addition to the forfeiture, Tomorrow Energy has, under the stipulation, ceased marketing and enrollments using the "multiple transfer method," discussed below
Tomorrow Energy also agreed to other corrective measures, including an auditing process for enrollments
In a Notice of
Probable Non-Compliance from PUCO Staff dated December 9, 2019, Staff had alleged that, "After
reviewing sales calls, third-party verification (TPV) recordings, and responses from Tomorrow
Energy, Staff determined that Tomorrow Energy is misleading customers during the enrollment
process. During the investigation, Staff identified numerous calls where a customer was
transferred from an initial sales call to an energy consultant, without any enrollment terms
stated. The customer was then asked by the energy consultant for account information, and
then transferred again to complete Tomorrow Energy’s TPV process. There is evidence that
during this initial, sales call, the agents representing Tomorrow Energy are making misleading
statements to customers prior to the call recording, then customers are being transferred to an
'energy consultant' followed by the TPV process. Additionally, several customers reference
promotions or benefits promised during a call that were not stated in the sales or TPV calls
provided."
Staff had initially proposed a forfeiture $140,000
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-20 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
July 15, 2020
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-20 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! --
Billing Specialist -- Retail Supplier
-- Texas
• NEW! --
Director - Distributed Generation, Demand Response, & Market Participation -- Houston
• NEW! --
Retail Energy Account Executive -- Houston
• NEW! --
Business Development Manager
|
|
|