Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

PPL Electric Utilities Calls For Restrictions On Introductory, Promotional & Teaser Rates From Retail Suppliers

PPL Says Over 26,000 Customers Of Retail Suppliers Paying Double The Default Service Rate

Residential Customers On Retail Supply Paid $97 Million More Than Default Service In One Year, PPL Says


April 5, 2021

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

Greg Dudkin, president of PPL Electric Utilities (PPL), had an op-ed published in the Allentown Morning Call in which he said, "We need restrictions around introductory, promotion and teaser rates," from competitive retail electric suppliers

"We’ve found many of our residential and small business customers are paying more for electricity through their supplier than they would have on the default rate. For customers paying more than the default rate, over a one-year period, our residential customers paid about $97 million more and small business customers paid $34 million more," Dudkin said

"Suppliers are intentionally vague in hopes you won’t understand the long-term cost increase or aren’t monitoring your electric bill closely. There are over 26,000 PPL customers paying double the price of default energy," Dudkin said

"Even if we assume that all customers paying above the default rate are purchasing renewable energy, we still find over 205,000 PPL residential shopping customers are paying approximately $93 million more based on our estimate of a market-based renewable rate of 1 cent per kilowatt-hour above the default energy rate," Dudkin said

"I believe we must critically evaluate the electricity retail market and put customer protections in place. We need restrictions around introductory, promotion and teaser rates. Suppliers need to be held accountable and be transparent," Dudkin said

Dudkin further said, "We should also reject any proposals that allow suppliers to aggregate and send a consolidated electric bill to customers directly. Giving suppliers full control over bill communication puts customers at a disadvantage and makes it more difficult for the utility companies such as PPL to protect customers."

See Dudkin's full op-ed in the Allentown Morning Call here

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Structure & Pricing Analyst -- Retail Supplier -- Texas
NEW! -- Director, Pricing -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- ERCOT Billing Specialist -- Retail Supplier -- Texas
NEW! -- Senior Analyst - Pricing & Structuring -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Sr. Analyst, Structuring -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Account Operations Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Senior Busines Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Senior Project Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Lead Data Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Operations Associate -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Pricing Analyst
NEW! -- Data Operations Analyst
NEW! -- Chief of the Planning and Procurement Bureau, Illinois Power Agency
NEW! -- Energy Operations & Reporting Associate
NEW! -- Commercial Sales Support Representative -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Channel Partner/Channel Sales Manager -- Houston
NEW! -- Wholesale Originator -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
NEW! -- Trading Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Renewables Trader -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Channel Partner Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Experienced Retail Energy Account Manager
NEW! -- Sales Channel Manager -- Retail Supplier

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-21 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search