Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Revised Substitute Texas Senate Bill Concerning REP Market Share Reported Favorably; Includes "Protections" Against Gentailers In Any PCM Market

April 3, 2023

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

The Texas Senate Committee on Business & Commerce has reported favorably a revised committee substitute for SB 2012

Text of the revised committee substitute was not immediately available

As described by Senator Charles Schwertner during a committee meeting, the version of SB 2012 that was reported favorably does not include the original 20% market share cap on retail electric providers which had been included in the original bill.

Schwertner said that the revised committee substitute includes the reporting requirement concerning REP market share. The original bill had provided that, "Each retail electric provider that offers electricity for sale shall report to the commission its annual retail sales in this state, the annual retail sales in this state by the provider's corporate parent, and any other information the commission requires to assess compliance with Subsection."

Schwertner said that the revised committee substitute clarifies and adds more protections to the Performance Credit Market (PCM) protections that had been included in earlier versions of the bill

Notably, Schwertner described one such PCM protection as, "preventing costs from being assigned in a way that unfairly benefits companies that own both generation and retail."

Schwertner further said that a PCM protection in the revised committee substitute is, "preventing generators receiving [PCM] credits from working only with retailers that they own [sic]." Since generators cannot own REPs, EnergyChoiceMatters believes the bill language will reflect this general provision applying to corporate parents or affiliates, though, as noted, the actual text of the revised committee substitute was not yet available

Concerning other aspects of the bill, Schwertner said that language requiring that the PUC "seasonally" procure A/S, which had been intended as PCM protection, has been removed, as such language could have affected all A/S which was not the intent

Concerning the ability of TDUs to build up to 5,000 MW of backstop generation under a safety net provision in the bill, Schwertner said that the revised committee substitute includes several changes.

Among other things, such "safety net", originally envisioned as up to 5,000 MW, may only be used if the PCM fails to attract an established amount of new dispatchable capacity (if unchanged from the original bill, 5,000 MW) within four years of PCM implementation. Notably, the bill does not mandate PCM implementation. Originally, the TDU safety net generation would have been tied to the amount of generation built between June 1, 2023, and December 31, 2026, rather than being tied to four years after PCM implementation.

Additionally, under the revised committee substitute, the safety net program would build new generation via a competitive RFP open to TDUs, generators, MOUs, and co-ops, rather than only TDUs

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Channel Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Business Development Manager
NEW! -- Operations Manager/Director -- Retail Supplier -- Texas
Senior Scheduler -- Retail Supplier
Channel Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier (Houston)

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-23 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search