Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Updates On Several Massachusetts Retail Energy Bills

December 4, 2025

Email This Story
Copyright 2025 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

The reporting date for Massachusetts bill H.4144, which is Gov. Maura Healey's bill which includes various retail energy market reforms, was extended to March 18, 2026

Among other things, H.4144 would require each energy marketer, retail supplier, or other supplier to provide a bond of $5 million for each retail license

H.4144 would also provide that, "A generation company or supplier may not ... automatically renew a residential customer’s contract at the end of a contract term without the written consent of the residential customer."

H.4144 would also require that all enrollments be processed through a state-run website

See more background on H.4144 here

Many of H.4144's provisions are also included in H.4744, which as previously noted was reported favorably from the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy in November, but at such time was also referred to the committee on House Ways and Means

See details on H.4744 here

Separately, the Senate issued a "study order" on several other energy market bills, directing the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy to further study the matters

According to the lawmaking process in Massachusetts, a study order indicates that the committee is not prepared to report the bill favorably, and authorizes more time to review the bill including during recess. However, study orders often result in no further action for a bill, and often indicate that a bill is dead

Specifically, S.2311 was included in the study order

S.2311 would require implementation of supplier consolidated billing, accelerated switching, and day-1 switching (instant connects)

S.2311 also includes various other retail market reforms, including a $5 million bond for suppliers, but generally its provisions are not as draconian as alternative bills. S.2311 would end individual retail choice for residential "low-income" customers, but would require a retail auction to serve these customers

Also subject to a study order is S.2257, which would have supported a process for municipalization of investor-owned utility infrastructure

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW -- Account Executive (Commercial Retail Energy)

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2025 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search