|
|
|
|
|
Switching Fee For Retail Supplier Switches Would Be Eliminated Under Rate Case Settlement
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
A stipulation among major parties to the electric rate case of AEP Ohio (Ohio Power) would eliminate the current switching fee applicable to switches to a retail electric supplier
Signatory parties to the settlement include AEP Ohio, PUCO Staff, Ohio Partners For
Affordable Energy, IGS Energy, the Retail Energy Supply
Association, Ohio Energy Leadership Council, Ohio Energy Group, and various other parties including other large customers. The Ohio Consumers' Counsel does not appear as a signatory
Under the current tariff, the $5 switching fee applies to any switches to a retail supplier, after an initial switch, and is charged to retail suppliers. Currently, the $5 switching fee does not apply to switches to default service
The stipulation would remove the switching fee from the AEP Ohio tariff, with
the revenue shortfall being reassigned
As first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters, AEP Ohio in the rate case had proposed, via tariff changes, that a competitive retail electric service (CRES) provider shall be deemed in default of its obligations under the utility's Customer Choice Program if, among other things, "The CRES fails to take suitable and timely action to stop inappropriate language showing on consolidated bill ready bills."
Retail suppliers had opposed this vague language
Under the settlement, this language is modified to provide that, "CRES Providers shall not include any profane or vulgar language on any customer
bills."
Under the settlement, AEP Ohio would maintain as $0 placeholder riders the Retail Reconciliation Rider and SSO
Credit Rider, until May 31, 2028. As previously reported, these riders were previously adopted as placeholder riders for potential implementation of a mechanism to compensate shopping customers for costs included in base rates which are solely related to default service, but the riders have never been established at any level other than $0. Generally, these riders had been designed as a proxy to allow further costs to be effectively unbundled from base rates (with only SSO customers paying the Retail Reconciliation Rider and all amounts which are collected under this rider then returned to all distribution customers under the SSO Credit Rider).
Additionally, the stipulation includes a provision concerning the costs of assessments to fund PUCO and the OCC, though the stipulation does not resolve the issue. Retail suppliers argue that PUCO/OCC assessments related to default service revenues should be bypassable, since retail suppliers also must pay assessments based on their supply revenues (resulting in shopping customers paying PUCO/OCC assessments based both on their own shopped supply revenue, as well as based on SSO supply revenue). PUCO Staff has previously opposed removing SSO-related PUCO/OCC assessment costs from base rates
The stipulation provides that, through 5/31/28, AEP
Ohio will track and record the variance (positive or negative) between the test-year PUCO and
OCC assessment amounts and actual assessments, and the utility shall be authorized to record
such variances as a regulatory asset or liability, with no carrying costs. The stipulation states that the Signatory Parties
reserve all rights regarding future recovery of any such regulatory asset or liability
The stipulation does not appear to address issues concerning historic customer usage information or interval data access fees raised by retail suppliers during the case.
Retail suppliers had proposed that AEP Ohio’s tariff be modified to make clear that there is no cost
to access historic usage information electronically, whether through EDI transactions or AEP
Ohio’s business portal or other electronic means, and that incremental costs will be
assessed only when the retail provider requests a report for data that could have
been accessed electronically
The stipulation would approve, as proposed by AEP Ohio, new levels for the fees for annual and initial retail supplier registrations
Under the settlement, AEP Ohio would increase the annual competitive retail electric service provider (CRES) registration renewal fee to $128 from the current $100
For initial CRES registrations, AEP Ohio under the settlement would increase the initial CRES registration fee to $356 from the current $100
Cases 25-393-EL-ATA, 25-392-EL-AIR, 25-394-EL-AAM, Ohio Power
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Stipulation Modifies Earlier Newly Proposed Condition Triggering Retail Supplier Default Under Utility Billing Agreement
January 7, 2026
Email This Story
Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW -- Account Executive (Commercial Retail Energy)
|
|
|
|
|