Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

RESA: PSC Should Direct Utilities To Develop Retail Supplier-Specific POR Discount Rates

RESA: POR Discount Must Be "Just and Reasonable"


February 23, 2026

Email This Story
Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

The Retail Energy Supply Association has endorsed, for the District of Columbia utilities, purchase of receivables (POR) discount rates specific to each retail supplier, as RESA requested that the D.C. PSC direct Pepco and Washington Gas Light to design such, with stakeholder input via a technical conference

RESA's comments came in a previously reported investigation by the PSC into the POR programs

RESA said that the utilities should report any system changes needed to implement supplier-specific POR discount rates, a timeline for implementation, and estimated costs

RESA said, "The POR programs, which have existed since 2013 for Pepco and 2018 for WGL, have evolved to the point where each supplier should have its own discount rate, ensuring proper cost-causation allocation and preventing cross-subsidization."

RESA notably said, "The POR discount rate is a rate charged by the utilities and paid by suppliers and, therefore, must be found to be just and reasonable."

RESA said, "Diligent suppliers with low residential uncollectibles pay more than their actual uncollectibles and therefore subsidize suppliers with higher uncollectibles. Conversely, a supplier with higher residential uncollectibles increases the utility’s costs but pays less than the utility’s cost to serve the supplier’s customers."

Addressing other POR matters, RESA suggested consideration of a two-year fixed POR discount, instead of an annual reset.

As previously reported, the D.C. POR programs have significant residential uncollectibles balances which have resulted in discount rates from 7% to 11%. As previously reported, the PSC is reviewing, among other options, a potential longer amortization period to address the uncollectibles balances

Of a two-year POR discount rate, RESA said, "This may present the same cost recovery risks as simply amortizing a significant under-collection, but it will preserve resources and increase rate certainty for retail suppliers making offers in the District. Significant movement in the residential discount rate during the time that a customer is under a fixed price contract increases price risk to retail suppliers."

RESA opposed, as unsupported, Pepco's proposal to cease using late fee revenue as an offset to POR uncollectibles (or Pepco's alternative of implementing a collections and administrative cost component to the POR discount)

Cases PEPPOR-2025-01, WGPOR-2025-01

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW -- Billing Analyst - Retail Supplier
NEW -- Manager, ISO Coordination (electricity), Retail Supplier
Refreshed 2/2/26 -- Account Executive (Commercial Retail Energy)

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search