Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

PSNH Small Customer Default Service Rate To Increase 24%

June 22, 2026

Email This Story
Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

Public Service of New Hampshire has filed to increase its energy service (default service) rate for the small customer group by 24%, effective August 1, 2026

For the PSNH small customer group (including residential customers), PSNH proposes to set the electric default service rate for the period August 2026 through January 2027 at $0.14009 per kWh, which is 24% higher than the current rate of $0.11303 per kWh.

For the Large customer group, PSNH proposes monthly default service rates as follows ($ per kWh):

August 2026 - $0.11862

September 2026 - $0.10645

October 2026 - $0.10528

November 2026 - $0.12119

December 2026 - $0.18350

January 2027 - $0.19760

PSNH reported that 57% of residential customers, 21% of commercial customers, and less than 8% of industrial customers currently take default service

PSNH reported that the small customer group is projected (through July 2026) to have an under-recovery of $25.7 million in default service costs, which reflects a current period under-recovery of $18.8 million, plus an existing $4.8 million under-recovery, and other factors.

PSNH cited, as a major driver of the under-recovery, the current proxy price methodology used to set the retail default service price for the 50% of small customer SOS load served directly from the ISO-NE market

PSNH said, "The evidence to date indicates that the self-supply proxy price has consistently fallen below the total ISO-NE billed costs of serving Energy Service load through self-supply market-based procurements, which have necessitated aggregate reconciliations totaling approximately $39 million through May 2026."

PSNH included in its filing an analysis which PSNH said, "demonstrates that establishing the self-supply proxy price using the lowest accepted supplier bid approach would have resulted in the lowest reconciliation amounts."

"[A]fter three completed market-based procurement rate periods, the Company’s analysis of the alternatives that have been presented to date demonstrates that replicating the lowest accepted supplier bid as the self-supply proxy price would have resulted in the lowest reconciliation balances," PSNH said

PSNH said, "Wholesale suppliers are experts at managing a generation portfolio and/or forward energy contracts and other market hedging strategies so it is reasonable to assume their 'risk premiums' include a reasonable attempt to value future market price volatility risk as well as market design and regulatory uncertainty risk. Furthermore, that approach would enable the self-supply proxy price to be better aligned with the accepted bids for the 50% of load allocated to wholesale suppliers under Full Requirements service".

PSNH also estimates that self-supply market-based procurements, when comparing the ISO-NE billed costs of serving Energy Service load through self-supply versus the rejected tranches that otherwise would have been selected under a 100% Full Requirements model, has saved customers $2.9 million during the period August 2024 - May 2026.

Concerning the length of the reconciliation period for SOS costs, PSNH said, "With respect to the question whether ES rate reconciliations should be implemented on a semi-annual rather than an annual basis, the Company does not see a compelling reason to make that change at this time. It is really a policy decision for the Commission to make, and the Company could administer the ES rate reconciliations on either frequency alternative, although more frequent reconciliations would likely increase the administrative burden and related A&G expenses to some degree."

In the PSNH default service proceeding, the PUC issued a preliminary ruling holding that the New Hampshire Office of Consumer Advocate's proposal to change how carrying charges are applied to default service over and under-collections will not be addressed in the instant phase of the proceeding, but may be addressed in a later phase, or in another proceeding

Docket DE 26-017

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
Refreshed 5/27/26 -- Manager, ISO Coordination (electricity), Retail Supplier
NEW -- Channel Partner Manager -- Retail Energy

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search