|
|
|
|
|
Another Utility Proposes To Assume Additional Non-Market PJM Cost, Remove Responsibility From SOS Suppliers
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
As other Exelon-owned utilities have done, Delmarva Power in Delaware has proposed that responsibility for PJM Billing Line Item 1935, U.S. DOE 202C charges, be transferred to the
utility, rather than being the responsibility of the wholesale SOS supplier
"This would require suppliers who are currently serving load to obtain a
new short name for future load," Delmarva noted in a filing at the Delaware PSC
Delmarva proposed the change as part of an annual update to the SOS full requirements service agreement
PJM Billing Line Item 1935 relates to U.S. Dept of Energy (DOE) emergency orders under Section 202C of the Federal Power Act.
Delmarva in the SOS filing did not address treatment of Billing Line Item 1935 for non-SOS suppliers (retail suppliers)
Docket 26-0821
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
August 17, 2026
Email This Story
Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW -- Enrollment & Rate Management Director - Retail Supplier
• NEW -- Strategic Sales Channels Manager - Retail Supplier
• NEW -- Controller - Retail Provider
• NEW -- Manager, Product I - VXRetail (Retail Energy)
• Refreshed 5/27/26 -- Manager, ISO Coordination (electricity), Retail Supplier
|
|
|
|
|