March 14, 2022
Report From Regulator's Staff Says 90% Of Shopping Residential Customers At Utility Paid Rate Above Default Service In Second Half Of 2021
The Staff of a utility regulator moved that an electric competition report be adopted
HomeNews By Docket & Bill NumberDocket 20-03-15
Docket 20-03-15
Narrow these results by state, topic, company or docket — filters stack, and every story shown carries all of them.
December 20, 2021
Regulator's Staff Seeks Proceeding To Consider Whether Retail Supplier Offers Are Overpriced Or Harmful
Regulator May Condition Access To Utilities' Systems Based On Such Findings
The Office of Education, Outreach, and Enforcement (EOE) of the Connecticut PURA and the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC) filed a motion requesting that PURA open a proceeding to investigate whether retail electric suppliers' offers are overpriced or harmful to residential customers
March 29, 2021
Draft Report: Over 83% Of Residential Customers With A Competitive Retail Supplier Were Charged A Rate In Excess Of A Utility's Default Service During Second Half Of 2020 (70% At Another EDC)
The Connecticut PURA has released a draft annual report to the legislature on the state of electric competition
August 26, 2020
While Noting "Inequities" Benefiting Retail Suppliers From Purchase Of Receivables, Regulator Finds POR Changes Not Cost Effective At This Time
Regulator Will Continue To Monitor POR, Says Changes "Warranted" If Cost Effective
In a final interim decision in its review of potential changes to the electric purchase of receivables (POR) mechanism, the Connecticut PURA finds that changes do not appear to be cost effective at this time, but finds that changes, "would be warranted," if later found to be cost effective
July 30, 2020
Regulator May Modify Purchase Of Receivables Mechanism If Alteration Found To Be "Cost Effective", Draft Says Current Mechanism "Inequitably" Benefits Retail Suppliers
The Connecticut PURA issued a proposed interim decision in its review of the electricity purchase of receivables mechanism, under which PURA would maintain the current mechanism only because alternatives have not been found to be cost effective, as PURA warned that future changes would be warranted…