HomeNews By TopicCompliance
Narrow these results by state, topic, company or docket — filters stack, and every story shown carries all of them.
October 21, 2010
An interim order which would withdraw proposed electric consumer protection rules in Illinois is set for consideration by the Illinois Commerce Commission on October 26 (Docket 09-0592), prompted by the upcoming one-year deadline since the rules were first noticed, and continuing work by an ALJ to…
October 19, 2010
Pacific Gas & Electric said that its acceptance of six-month Notices of Intent from legacy direct-access eligible customers during the period between March 11, 2010 and April 11, 2010 complied with the California PUC's order regarding the direct access load cap and its own tariffs (R. 07-05-025).
October 15, 2010
The PUCT adopted a modified preliminary order concerning Clearview Electric's petition for a waiver of the financial requirements of Subst. R. 25.107(f) ( see earlier coverage ).
October 14, 2010
TexRep6, LLC said that it has hired Sequoia Advisors to meet the risk management and other technical fitness requirements of PUCT Subst. R. 25.107, but still has not completed financing to meet the financial requirements of §25.107.
October 14, 2010
Under a draft preliminary order proposed by PUCT Staff, the Commission would determine that a limited load or customer count do not per se constitute good cause for a waiver from any of the requirements set forth in P.U.C. SUBST. R. 25.107(f) or (k). The draft preliminary order concerns Clearview…
October 13, 2010
Consolidated Edison, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Consolidated Edison Solutions, and Consolidated Edison Development have jointly requested a declaratory ruling from the New York Public Service Commission that 200 MW of renewable energy projects to be developed and owned by ConEdison Solutions and…
October 11, 2010
AllStar Energy (TexRep 5 LLC) has entered into an amended settlement with PUCT Staff under which Staff would withdraw its petition for revocation of AllStar's certificate and recommend approval of an amendment to AllStar's certificate to clarify its ownership, and under which AllStar would pay an…
October 8, 2010
Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC would pay an administrative penalty of $50,000 under a settlement with PUCT Staff to resolve Staff's allegations that Reliant was not in compliance with 14 provisions of the Substantive Rules (38785).
October 6, 2010
Clearview Electric has explicitly offered to not add any new customers to its ERCOT book as part of its request for a temporary waiver of the new financial requirements under P.U.C. SUBST. R. §25.107(f), it said in a brief supporting its request (38446).
October 1, 2010
FERC accepted the findings and recommendations of separate audits of DTE Energy Company and affiliates (Docket PA10-12); EDF Inc. and affiliates including EDF Trading (Docket PA10-11); and EIF Management, LLC and affiliates (PA10-10); relating to the filing of electric quarterly reports (EQR) and…
October 1, 2010
The Maryland PSC lacks the statutory authority to license curtailment service providers, Baltimore Gas & Electric and several curtailment service providers (CSPs) said in separate comments in Case 9241.
September 30, 2010
The PUCT approved separate settlements under which Accent Energy (38550), Penstar Power (38596), and Gexa Energy (38632) will pay various administrative penalties to resolve allegations from Staff that each has violated several provisions of the Substantive Rules.
September 30, 2010
The PUCT directed Staff to seek modifications to a settlement with AllStar Energy (organized as TexRep5 LLC) under which Staff would withdraw its petition to revoke AllStar's REP certificate; agree to support an amendment to the current certificate; and subject AllStar to a penalty and compliance…
September 30, 2010
Commercial Energy of Montana, under proceeding R. 07-05-025, petitioned the California PUC to issue an order to show cause to Pacific Gas & Electric directing PG&E to demonstrate, "why it should not be deemed out of compliance with the Commission's Decision (D.) 10-03-022, regarding implementation…
September 29, 2010
Green Mountain Energy Company would pay an administrative penalty of $16,500 under a settlement to resolve allegations by PUCT Staff that Green Mountain was not in compliance with eight provisions of the Substantive Rules (Docket 38740). Staff's allegations were the result of an audit.
