|
|
|
|
|
Update On Enron Energy Texas REP Application (6/2)
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
While EnergyChoiceMatters.com typically does not cover routine or administrative developments in retail supplier licensing proceedings, because of intense reader interest in the Texas REP application of Enron Energy Texas LLC ("Enron"), ECM provides the following update for those counting the days since the initial application.
As previously reported, on May 20, Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas issued a request for information to Enron Energy Texas LLC
As more fully detailed in our prior story, the RFIs relate to the prior risk management and competitive electric or gas industry experience of Gregory Forero, Vice President & Executive Manager of Enron Energy Texas, and, per the public portion of Enron's application, an individual upon whom Enron Energy Texas LLC is relying to meet the required necessary prior risk management and competitive electric or gas industry experience
On May 30, Enron filed a response to the RFI, further detailing Forero's prior risk management and competitive electric and gas industry experience
On June 2, PUC Staff filed a request for an extension of the deadline for the filing of Staff's recommendation on the disposition of Enron's REP application
Staff said that Staff requires time to review the RFI responses prior
to making a final recommendation on the disposition of the application. Staff requested a new
deadline of June 16, 2025 (extended from the original deadline of June 2, 2025) to file a recommendation on final disposition
Any potential extension of the deadline for Staff's recommendation (an ALJ must rule on Staff's extension request) does not result in an extension of the overall deadline for the PUC to render a decision on Enron's application. Staff's extension was narrowly limited to the deadline for a Staff recommendation, and was filed pursuant to a procedural rule on filings, and not the rule under which the consideration of a REP application itself may be extended
Except where good cause is shown to extend consideration, the Texas REP certification rules require the PUC to issue an order approving, rejecting, or approving with modifications a REP application within 90 days of a finding that the application is sufficient for further review. As previously reported, the Enron application was found sufficient for further review on May 12, 2025.
At this time, no party has requested a good cause extension of this overall final decision deadline.
Docket 57544
Copyright 2025 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
June 2, 2025
Email This Story
Copyright 2025 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
|
|
|
|
|