Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Plaintiff Dismisses PUC Complaint, Court Suit Against Texas REP Which Had Included Rare Court Order For REP To Remove Switch Hold

May 8, 2026

Email This Story
Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

A complainant has filed to dismiss with prejudice a complaint at the Texas PUC against BKV-BPP Retail LLC (BKV Energy), with the complainant also filing a "notice of nonsuit with prejudice" in an associated Harris County court case

The proceedings had been notable because, as first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com, the complainant had obtained from the Harris County court, via a temporary restraining order granted without a hearing, an order from the court requiring the immediate removal of a switch hold placed on the complainant's account, in a rare, and possibly novel, action. The county court later confirmed the order requiring the removal of the switch hold after hearing from all parties

See background here

The customer's now-withdrawn complaint at the PUC had generally alleged that BKV-BPP Retail disconnected the customer at various points, and had alleged that BKV-BPP Retail did not properly document, memorialize in writing, or provide notice of amounts included or excluded from a deferred payment plan, allegedly contrary to rule. The customer's complaint had also generally alleged that disconnections have occurred without "meaningful" notice

As detailed in our prior stories, BKV-BPP Retail has denied the allegations

The complainant has now at the PUC filed a motion to dismiss the PUC complaint with prejudice, stating that the complainant, "reached an agreement with BKV-BPP Retail LLC ('BKV Energy') that resolves all the issues raised in the formal Complaint I filed with the Commission on December 15, 2025, and the subsequent filings I have made in this proceeding."

"I have executed a settlement agreement and release that fully encompasses all claims and issues between myself and BKV Energy that I have raised in this proceeding. I therefore no longer desire to pursue my Complaint against BKV Energy. I hereby withdraw my Complaint against BKV Energy and request that it be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 16 Tex. Admin. Code. § 22.181(a)," the complainant said in a PUC filing

A caption of a filing in the Harris County court case is labeled as a "Plaintiffs' Notice of Nonsuit with Prejudice".

A copy of the court filing was not immediately available.

Harris County District Court Docket: 202611413

Texas PUC Docket: 59122

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW -- Director of Broker Relations -- Retail Supplier
NEW -- Channel Partner Manager -- Retail Energy
Manager of Sales, Commercial -- Retail Supplier
Commercial Sales Support Specialist -- Retail Supplier
Refreshed 2/24/26 -- Manager, ISO Coordination (electricity), Retail Supplier

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2026 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search