ECM, Energy Choice Matters

Informing the Industry on What Truly Matters
in Retail Energy

Sign InRegister

HomeNews By CompanyOPC

OPC

323 stories · September 28, 2010 to September 18, 2026

Narrow these results by state, topic, company or docket — filters stack, and every story shown carries all of them.

Free account. Its newest stories collect on your account page.

OPC Says Low-Income Customer Participation In Retail Choice Outpaces Overall Market

Says Data Voluntarily Provided By One Utility Shows Low-Income Customers Paying More Than SOS Renews Call For PSC To Require All Utilities To Report On Costs Paid By Retail Choice Customers Versus Default Service

In comments on an FY 2020 plan concerning the electric universal service program (EUSP) in Maryland, the Office of People’s Counsel said that low-income customers on competitive retail electric supply at the Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative (SMECO) have incurred, "massive net losses" versus…

Click for More

RESA Releases Analysis Which It Says Reveals Flaws In Recent Maryland OPC And The Abell Foundation Reports On Retail Energy Market

RESA Says Independent Study Finds Electric Suppliers Could Have Saved Maryland Consumers More Than $203 Million in 2018 Abell Report Had Recommended Ending Individual Residential Choice, Limiting Choice To Aggregations

The Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA) today released an analysis which it said, "calls into question recent reports by the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel (OPC) and The Abell Foundation."

Click for More

Report: Maryland Households On Competitive Retail Supply Paid $255 Million More Than SOS From 2014-17

Report Recommends Ending Individual Residential Choice, Limiting Choice To Aggregations Report Says 5,000 Customers Of Retail Supplier Paid 76% More Than SOS

A report published by The Abell Foundation said that, "from 2014 to 2017, Maryland households have been paying tens of millions of dollars more per year in aggregate to third-party electricity suppliers -- about $255 million more in all than if they had stayed with their utility’s supply offer."

Click for More

In Final Order, Pa. PUC Denies Re-allocation Of $100 Million From PECO Distribution Rates To Default Service

PUC: "Distinction ... Between Shopping And Non-Shopping Customers Is Not A Definable [Ratemaking] Classification"

The Pennsylvania PUC in a final order in a PECO rate case has denied a proposal from NRG Energy to re-allocate approximately $100 million in costs at PECO which NRG had argued are attributable to electricity default service and thus should be allocated to generation rates rather than nonbypassable…

Click for More

OPC News (Page 7) | EnergyChoiceMatters.com