ECM, Energy Choice Matters

Informing the Industry on What Truly Matters
in Retail Energy

Sign InRegister

HomeJanuary 4, 2011

Tenaska Taylorville Proponents, Opponents Gear Up for Final Push

Email This Story

Copyright 2011 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

In just about a week's time, Illinois alternative retail electric suppliers should know one way or another whether a new mandate that requires them to purchase the output of the Tenaska Taylorville Energy Center, with no cap on their obligations, will be enacted, or will fail.

Costs from the coal plant to mass market customers on default service would be subject to a 2% rate impact cap.

The House passed the Tenaska sourcing agreements bill (SB2485) in November, but the Senate delayed a vote until January. The new legislative session begins January 12; if the bill is not passed before then, it would need to undergo the entire legislative process again, a process that Tenaska has intimated it is not willing to pursue.

The STOP Coalition renewed its opposition to the plan citing the plant's 21.3¢ per kilowatt-hour price, and costs of $504,000 per year for every job the plant creates.

Tenaska countered that new baseload is needed, evidenced by Exelon CEO John Rowe informing investors in a July earnings call that EPA regulations will force the retirements of significant baseload, and that the, "upside to Exelon is unmistakable" (7/23).

You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.

Copyright 2011 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

Energy Search PartnersEnd of Story BannerBefore NewNow 728 × 90New slot. Directly under the article text, at peak attention.

More News

Tenaska Taylorville Proponents, Opponents Gear Up for Final Push | EnergyChoiceMatters.com