ECM, Energy Choice Matters

Informing the Industry on What Truly Matters
in Retail Energy

Sign InRegister

HomeAugust 14, 2013

FERC Subjects New York ESCOs to New Local Capacity Requirements

Email This Story

Copyright 2013 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

FERC has adopted without modification the New York ISO's proposal to create a new local capacity zone in the ICAP market, consisting of Load Zones G, H, I, and J (the G-J Locality), applicable to load-serving entities including ESCOs

Although Zone J is a part of the new capacity zone, Zone J will also continue to be a separate capacity zone with its own Locational Capacity Requirement and its own ICAP Demand Curve. Therefore, Zones G, H, and I, by themselves, will not have a separate Locational Capacity Requirement or ICAP Demand Curve. Rather, Zones G, H, I, and J together will have an aggregate Locational Capacity Requirement and ICAP Demand Curve.

This means that capacity located anywhere within the G-J new capacity zone could be used to meet the Locational Capacity Requirement of the new capacity zone.

NYISO did not propose to include Zone K in the new capacity zone, citing insufficient transmission capability.

NYISO did acknowledge that approximately 300 MW of generation capacity added to Zone K would be "fungible" with capacity in Zones G, H, and I – that is, 300 MW added to Zone K could displace an equal amount of capacity in Zones G, H, and I while maintaining the Loss of Load Expectation.

Various load interests argued that additional amounts of capacity added to Zone K could provide lesser, but significant, reliability benefits to Zones G, H, and I, and that Zone K should therefore be included in the new capacity zone.

FERC found NYISO's proposal to exclude Zone K from the new capacity zone to be reasonable at this time.

However, FERC noted that commenters have raised the possibility of modeling Load Zone K as an export-constrained zone.

"In light of the comments, the Commission would like to explore in a separate proceeding whether and how Zone K should be modeled as an export-constrained zone for future Demand Curve reset proceedings. Due to the complex nature of this issue, the Commission believes it should be explored in a Staff-led technical conference. Therefore, we direct Commission staff to conduct a technical conference in a separate docket to discuss with interested parties whether or not to model Load Zone K as an export-constrained zone for a future Demand Curve reset proceeding. The details of such conference will follow in a subsequent notice," FERC said.

FERC dismissed load protests seeking a phase-in of the new capacity zone.

Docket ER13-1380

You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.

Copyright 2013 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

Energy Search PartnersEnd of Story BannerBefore NewNow 728 × 90New slot. Directly under the article text, at peak attention.

More News

FERC Subjects New York ESCOs to New Local Capacity Requirements | EnergyChoiceMatters.com