HomeMarch 28, 2014
Settlement Would Continue Use of 24-Month Contracts for Pennsylvania Default Service Through 2017
Copyright 2014 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.
A partial settlement would continue the use of 24-month contracts for a significant portion of residential default service at Met-Ed, Penelec, Penn Power, and West Penn Power through May 31, 2017.
The settlement would resolve all issues related to the FirstEnergy Pennsylvania utilities' default service plan for the period June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2017, except for the issue of whether Network Integration Transmission Service should be considered the responsibility of generation suppliers, or the utility, which was reserved for litigation.
A copy of the settlement was not immediately available, but the main tenets were described by the FirstEnergy utilities in their briefs.
In the utilities' original default service proposal, the utilities had proposed to procure for residential and commercial service (separately for each class) 95% of default service through fixed price, load following full requirements contracts with staggered 3, 12, 24 and 48-month terms, with the remaining 5% of default service procured on the spot market.
Some 23.75% of default service was proposed to be priced based on a 3-month purchase, 23.75% was proposed to be priced based on a 12-month purchase, 23.75% was proposed to be priced based on a 24-month purchase, and 23.75% was proposed to be priced based on a 48-month purchase. In other words, 47.5% of residential and commercial default service was proposed to be priced based on contracts lasting two years or longer in length
According to the utilities' brief, the settlement eliminates the use of 3-month and 48-month full requirements contracts for the 95% fixed price portion of the residential product. Only 12 and 24-month contracts would be used; the brief did not explicitly state the percentage of residential default service to be procured under each contract length.
For the commercial class, the settlement eliminates the spot component of pricing and the full requirements products will have staggered 3-month (28%), 12-month (36%) and 24-month (36%) terms.
The settlement provides that the utilities will conduct descending clock auctions for the 24-month residential and commercial products in October 2014, January 2015 and April 2015. In addition, the utilities will procure 12-month contracts for the residential and commercial classes in three separate auctions in October, January and April of each year beginning in October 2014. Starting in April 2015, the utilities will hold four auctions per year for 3-month products (i.e., in April, June, October, and January) for the commercial customer class.
Currently, charges assessed by PJM Interconnection, for transmission services -- excluding Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (RTEP) charges and Expansion Cost Recovery charges (ECRC) - are embedded in the utilities' Price-to-Compare for default service, and retail suppliers are responsible for these costs for shopping customers.
The settlement provides that in addition to RTEP charges and ECRCs, the utilities' nonbypassable default service support riders will recover for all distribution customers unaccounted for energy (UFE) costs as well as the following PJM charges billed to the utilities: (1) those attributable to reliability must run (RMR) generating unit declarations and deactivations of generating plants qualifying for such payments after the Commission's approval of the revised default service plan; and (2) historical out of market tie line, generation, and retail customer meter adjustments. Retail suppliers would be relieved from paying for such charges.
The lone litigated issue in the case is whether Network Integration Transmission Service should continue to be the responsibility of the customer's generation supplier, or whether it should be the responsibility of the utility for all distribution customers (similar to the other PJM charges described above). Retail suppliers generally favor making NITS the responsibility of the utility for all customers; this proposal is opposed by large customers.
P-2013-2391368
You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.
Copyright 2014 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

