HomeDecember 23, 2016
FERC Subjects Dynegy Purchase of GDF Suez Plants To Mitigation
Divestiture Or Other Mitigation Measures Must Be Proposed
Copyright 2016 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.
FERC issued an order finding that a transaction under which Dynegy would acquire 8,731 megawatts of generation capacity from Engie (f/k/a GDF Suez) raises competitive concerns in certain capacity market local deliverability areas, and conditioned approval of the acquisition on mitigation
See background here on what was originally the acquisition of the Engie plants by a Dynegy-Energy Capital Partners (Atlas) JV here. Dynegy since entered into a transaction to acquire Energy Capital Partners' interest in Atlas (details here)
"[B]ased on Applicants’ representations and Commission analyses, we find that Applicants have not demonstrated that the Proposed Transactions will not adversely affect competition in the PJM and ISO-NE capacity markets. Specifically, Applicants have not demonstrated that the GSENA Transaction will not adversely affect competition both within the COMED LDA in the PJM capacity market and within the SENE capacity zone in the ISO-NE capacity market," FERC said.
With respect to the COMED LDA, FERC's finding was specifically made due to the impact from the retirements of Quad Cities Generating Station and Unit 4 of the Will County Generating Station
"[W]e conditionally authorize the GSENA Transaction subject to Applicants proposing mitigation that addresses the competition concerns," FERC said
FERC noted that such mitigation could include divestitures or other mitigation measures
Applicants were directed to propose mitigation within 30 days
You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.
Copyright 2016 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

