HomeApril 1, 2019
Small Business Advocate Seeks Two-Month Extension For Comments In Proceeding Examining Major Changes In Pennsylvania Default Service
Proceeding Could End Plain Vanilla Default Service, End Use Of Full Requirements Contracts
Copyright 2019 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
The Pennsylvania Office of Small Business Advocate has asked the Pennsylvania PUC for a 60-day extension for the filing of initial comments in the PUC's new proceeding examining "smart" default service rates, cost allocation, and rate design (captioned officially as "Investigations into Default Service and PJM Interconnection, LLC. Settlement Reforms")
As exclusively first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com, the PUC in the proceeding launched a review of wholesale cost allocation and default service rate design and procurement reforms due to the installation of smart meters, which could lead to a significant change in how default service is procured and priced, including a departure from plain vanilla default service served primarily through load-following full requirements contracts
Commissioner Andrew Place had requested that such a proceeding be opened as he expressed concern that non-shopping customers under the current default service rate design (flat pricing) would not be rewarded for "positive" behaviors, such as load shifting, peak reductions, etc.
In requesting stakeholder comments, the PUC asked, among other things, if default service should have a Time of Use, critical peak, peak time rebate, or other dynamic pricing structure
The PUC also asked for comments on changes in the procurement method and contracts used for default service, including whether full requirements contracts remain appropriate or whether long-term contracts should be used
See our prior story for a full discussion of the PUC's investigation
The PUC had ordered that comments in response to an initiating order are due no later than 90 days from the entry date of the order, which was issued February 26, 2019. The PUC ordered that reply comments are due 120 days from the date of the order
OSBA asked that initial comments be due 150 days from the entry date of the order and that reply comments be due 180 days from the entry date of the order
OSBA stated that it contacted the Office of Consumer Advocate, the Energy Association of Pennsylvania, and the Retail Energy Supply Association regarding its request and each of these parties indicated they have no objection to the relief requested
M-2019-3007101
You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.
Copyright 2019 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

