ECM, Energy Choice Matters

Informing the Industry on What Truly Matters
in Retail Energy

Sign InRegister

HomeSeptember 11, 2013

Texas A/S Provider to Pay $52,000 Under Settlement Related to Non-Spin Deployment

Email This Story

Copyright 2013 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. would pay $52,000 under a settlement with Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas to resolve STEC's alleged failure to adhere to ERCOT protocols related to non-spinning reserve service (NSRS) energy deployment criteria.

Specifically, Staff had alleged that the STEC resources RAYBURN_RAYBURG1 and RAYBURN_RAYBURG2 failed to reach their Low Sustained Limit (LSL) within 25 minutes on either March 9, 2012 or March 31, 2012, as required by ERCOT Protocol § 8.1.1.4.3(3)(b).

On March 9, 2012, STEC attempted to transfer its NSRS responsibility from its RAYBURN_RAYBURG1 and RAYBURN_RAYBURG2 units to three Pearsall units that were already on-line. However, the Pearsall units were already operating near their High Sustainable Limit, and thus no additional capacity was available to be dispatched as NSRS. Therefore, Staff alleged that STEC did not successfully transfer the obligation, and failed to dispatch to its NSRS resource responsibility within 30 minutes of a dispatch instruction, as required by ERCOT Protocol § 6.5.7.6.2.3(4).

On March 31, 2012, STEC attempted to transfer its NSRS responsibility from its RAYBURN_RAYBURG1 and RAYBURN_RAYBURG2 units to its combined cycle plant that was online. Unlike the March 9, 2012 transfer, STEC was successful in transferring its NSRS responsibility to its combined cycle plant because sufficient capacity existed to cover the NSRS responsibility on that unit. However, Staff alleged that STEC was still late in meeting the 25 minute Protocol requirement in § 8.1.1.4.3(3)(b).

Docket 41822

You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.

Copyright 2013 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

Energy Search PartnersEnd of Story BannerBefore NewNow 728 × 90New slot. Directly under the article text, at peak attention.

More News

Texas A/S Provider to Pay $52,000 Under Settlement Related to Non-Spin Deployment | EnergyChoiceMatters.com