October 12, 2011
Briefly
PUCT Audit Finds Texpo Power Appropriately Implementing Lite-Up Discount
HomeNews By TopicCompliance
Narrow these results by state, topic, company or docket — filters stack, and every story shown carries all of them.
October 12, 2011
PUCT Audit Finds Texpo Power Appropriately Implementing Lite-Up Discount
October 10, 2011
"[T]here is no basis at this time to doubt that the Commission has authority to adopt privacy rules for either ESPs [electric service providers] or CCAs [community choice aggregators]," California PUC President Michael Peevey said in a scoping ruling concerning smart grid privacy standards, though a…
October 10, 2011
A draft California PUC decision would determine that unbundled RECs may not be used to satisfy the Pub. Util. Code § 399.16(b)(1) RPS requirement, which under the recent SB 2 (1X) is the largest among three carve-outs in the RPS, starting at 50% of the total RPS requirement for the 2013 compliance…
October 10, 2011
A proposed order from PUCT docket management would allow TexRep6 LLC, which is owned by Smartcom Energy Technologies, LLC, to maintain its REP certificate and would deny Staff's original petition to revoke the certificate (38732).
October 7, 2011
Constellation Confirms Small Business Gas Service at PECO, PGW
October 7, 2011
Brooklyn Union Gas (National Grid/KeySpan New York) is seeking to involuntarily terminate Blue Rock Energy's right to serve customers at Brooklyn Union, due to a failure to deliver, and Blue Rock Energy has filed a complaint at the New York PSC to stop the termination (Case 11-01982).
October 6, 2011
MXenergy reported to the Connecticut PURA that it erroneously sent early termination fee collection letters to several customers, and "a small percentage" of those customers paid the fee in error as a result.
October 6, 2011
As of August 31, 2011, Viridian Energy was serving 24,825 active electric customers in Maryland, according a compliance report filed with the PSC.
October 4, 2011
The Connecticut PURA has opened an investigation of Public Power, LLC under Docket 11-10-06.
September 30, 2011
A draft Connecticut PURA decision (10-06-24) would conclude that a person is a "legal agent" of an electric supplier if such person "contracts with" or "is compensated by" the electric supplier to sell electric generation services, even if common-law factors, such as the person's authority to act on…
September 29, 2011
PUCT Commissioner Kenneth Anderson has recommended that the contemplated suspension of Clearview Electric's REP certificate should only be in place through July 1, 2012, at which time Clearview must show compliance with all provisions of the Substantive Rules or be subject to certificate revocation.
September 22, 2011
Texas Power L.P. would pay $65,000 under a settlement with PUCT Staff to resolve allegations that Texas Power was not in full compliance with 30 provisions of the Substantive Rules (39791).
September 21, 2011
Direct Energy Marketing Limited shall reimburse Ontario customers approximately $950,000, plus interest, and pay an administrative penalty of $700,000, under an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance with the Ontario Energy Board to resolve an investigation of customers who were charged an early…
September 16, 2011
FERC yesterday ordered the RTOs to engage in ongoing compliance reviews of market participants' risk management policies, further expanding the breadth of RTOs' power beyond their originally intended functions.
September 16, 2011
The PUCT unabated a proceeding regarding TexRep6's REP certificate, directing docket management to prepare a proposed order, or, if appropriate, address the matter through delegated administrative approval (38732).
September 16, 2011
The PUCT yesterday deferred action on a proposed order which would suspend, but not revoke, the REP certificate of Clearview Electric (38446).
September 15, 2011
Acacia Energy Inc. would pay $40,000 under a settlement with PUCT Staff to resolve allegations that Acacia was not in full compliance with 23 provisions of the Substantive Rules (39767).
September 15, 2011
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio directed 20 energy suppliers and brokers to show cause why PUCO should not revoke such entity's certification for what PUCO alleged was failure to file an annual report of sales and receipts for 2010 (11-03-GE-RPT).
September 14, 2011
PUCT Staff said that TexRep6, LLC is now in compliance the financial, technical, and managerial requirements for REP certification, including the financial provisions of Subst. R. 25.107 (38732).
September 14, 2011
Clearview Electric said that it and the PUCT Staff have agreed to a specific deadline under which Clearview would have to come into compliance with the financial security requirements for REP certification, or its certificate would be revoked.
September 13, 2011
The Ontario Energy Board has accepted Assurances of Voluntary Compliance from nine retail energy suppliers, in response to the Board's recent notices that it intended to take enforcement action against 12 suppliers for various allegations of non-compliance with customer protection rules.
September 13, 2011
The District of Columbia PSC has again rejected a series of changes to Washington Gas Light Rate Schedule No. 3 (Interruptible Sales Service), Rate Schedule No. 3A (Interruptible Delivery Service) and Rate Schedule No. 6 (Small Commercial Aggregation Pilot), finding that certain provisions remain…
September 12, 2011
PUCT Staff have proposed assessments on various retail electric providers and generators (as well as TDUs and telecomms) to fund the cost of internet broadcasting of PUCT meetings for 2012, as required by statute.
September 12, 2011
Washington Gas Light, "acted outside the provisions of its tariff," by utilizing a cash-out procedure to reconcile retail supplier delivery imbalances for the period January through March 2009, the Maryland PSC said in an order Friday (Case 9509 (d)).
September 7, 2011
The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority has issued data requests to several electric suppliers concerning compliance with Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 16-245o, particularly with respect to persons or entities that the supplier uses to solicit customers.