ECM, Energy Choice Matters

Informing the Industry on What Truly Matters
in Retail Energy

Sign InRegister

HomeJanuary 11, 2016

Initial Decision Would Fine Retail Supplier $2,500, Order Refund

Email This Story

Copyright 2016 EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

An initial decision from a Pennsylvania ALJ would impose a civil penalty in the amount of $2,500 on Blue Pilot Energy, Inc., and require the company to issue a refund, in granting a customer complaint

The initial decision is not final and may be appealed.

In the complaint, the customer alleged that he enrolled in a one year fixed rate plan with Blue Pilot in May, 2014, at an introductory rate of 8.49 cents per kilowatt-hour, and alleged that, with no prior written notification, he was charged higher rates up to 25 cents per kilowatt-hour during the months of June, July, and August 2014.

Although Blue Pilot responded to a complaint (a respond which the ALJ called procedurally deficient), Blue Pilot failed to attend a hearing on the complaint, the ALJ said

Therefore, the ALJ would conclude that the complainant's, "unrefuted testimony is sufficient to bear his burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence that Blue Pilot violated the Commission’s regulations."

"The unrefuted testimony of Complainant is sufficient to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that Blue Pilot failed to bill prices to reflect the marketed prices when Complainant enrolled with Blue Pilot in May, 2014. Further, I find the incorrect billing occurred three times (in June, July and August 2014) in violation of 52 Pa.Code § 54.4(a). Further, Complainant’s testimony that he never received terms of agreement or a welcome letter from Blue Pilot is sufficient to meet his burden of proving Blue Pilot failed to give him the requisite disclosure statement pursuant to Section 54.5. As a result, pursuant to 66 Pa.C.S. § 3301, Complainant is entitled to a refund in the amount of the difference between what he was actually billed and what he should have been billed, a rate of 8.49 cents per kilowatt hour during the months of June, July and August, 2014," the ALJ would find.

Additionally, the ALJ would impose a civil penalty equaling $500 per overbilling occurrence plus a civil penalty of $1,000 for failure to provide a disclosure statement

Docket F-2015-2500535

You can follow specific tags with a free account and see their newest stories in one place. Sign up or sign in.

Copyright 2016 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com.

Energy Search PartnersEnd of Story BannerBefore NewNow 728 × 90New slot. Directly under the article text, at peak attention.

More News

Initial Decision Would Fine Retail Supplier $2,500, Order Refund | EnergyChoiceMatters.com